8 Nov
2011
8 Nov
'11
10:07 a.m.
On 11/08/2011 09:46 AM, Brandon Allbery wrote:
There seems to be a persistent notion that the current state of xmonad is something we actively encourage or have set as policy.
It's not. We're as frustrated as you are, and we've been trying to get this sorted for some 2 years. What you're seeing is ugly workarounds, not something anyone involved with xmonad intends.
So, at the risk of encouraging airing of dirty laundry: darcs is a _D_vcs, right? So if The Community has wanted a new release for two years, then what is preventing someone from saying "FINE! I call 0.99, _here_"? Is there some official possession of credentials that is at issue? - Allen S. Rout