8 Apr
2009
8 Apr
'09
11:03 p.m.
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Adam Vogt
The XMonad.Config namespace seems like it could use some love: it has some redundancy (Xfce, Kde, Desktop), and it could probably showcase more elabourate configs.
Another thing that I've found is that the sample configs on the wiki are based on the template: personally they are (in general) a bit verbose. Would it be a good thing to show just the minimum necessary, or is it helpful that the configs are explicit?
I don't entirely follow this. Configs haven't been based on the template since 0.5; are you looking at the ones in the old section? -- gwern