Re: [xmonad] RFC: XMonad.Prompt.ConfirmPrompt module

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:09 PM, Michael Sloan wrote:

Certainly! It didn't cause me issues 7 or 8 years ago when I wrote those modules in the first place. Point is, I haven't used darcs in that time, and so how to use it has faded. I could create a git branch and submit a pull request in under a minute.

Let me re-iterate that this is due to supreme laziness, primarily due to these cleanups being unimportant. It's more of a vanity thing, as I wrote the code back when I was still new to Haskell.

I'm all in favor of facilitating more contributions and don't mind a git migration for that.

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Peter Jones wrote:

...

Michael Sloan writes:

...

I think we could see a revitalization of XMonad if such barriers to contribution are lowered. I would certainly be more likely to contribute patches.

I just submitted my first patch and I can say that Darcs didn't cause me any issues.

There's been a lot of talk about code review system but what are we using right now for XMonad? I can say that I certainly don't like the idea of submitting patches to a mailing list. I have no idea if the patches I've submitted have been seen or will fall off the fold as new messages come in.

-- Peter Jones, Founder, Devalot.com Defending the honor of good code

_______________________________________________ xmonad mailing list xmonad@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad

---

xmonad mailing list xmonad@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad