6 Dec
2009
6 Dec
'09
5:29 a.m.
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH
On Dec 5, 2009, at 23:49 , Don Stewart wrote:
Well, breaking configs is a /bad/ thing. We've seen a lot of heat on awesome because of this, so it isn't something to do lightly.
Hm? I thought defining <+> as mappend was already pending on libraries@? (And would that really break configs?)
Even if Control.Monoid got <+>, Xmonad core couldn't remove <+> entirely - what about people doing things like 'import XMonad (...(<+>))'? If we have to re-export, might as well just keep a a line like '(<+>) = mappend'. This is definitely not worth breaking configs over. -- gwern