26 Oct
2007
26 Oct
'07
7:12 p.m.
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 03:56:13PM -0700, Stefan O'Rear wrote:
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 12:18:23AM +0200, Andrea Rossato wrote:
I think this is a less burdensome requirement than the readline library, after all.
Why would it be? Bash absolutely requires readline (and includes a copy, but that's not relevent since you still need a readline-capable system).
What I meant is that using directly a readline function requires modifying the xmonad.cabal file (we used to do that). This is more burdensome for the user. Moreover, since a modification of the cabal file is required, the module cannot be inserted in MetaModule and thus automatically checked. Andrea