Re: [xmonad] A community-driven effort to make XMonad better and better

On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Carlos López Camey wrote:

2012/11/7 Carsten Mattner :

...

xmonad used darcs and therefore http://hub.darcs.net would be a better fit. Joachim's patch tracker works and darcs works.

I think we only need more reviewers and contributors and a more active committer to the canonical darcs repository.

+1. In addition to it, a release plan would be just as appropriate.

+1 A related datapoint is that I've seen more than one project on github without a release plan and therefore github not automatically solving that problem. It's all about active contributors and maintainers if you ask me. I suppose what I'm saying is that xmonad has a maintainer and not a tooling issue.

It has been 1 year since the 0.10 release. If we are doing the 0.11 (or just peak at current progress) and want to summarize fixed bugs or features in a changelog, is the bug tracker's Advanced search [0] the tool to use?

[0] http://code.google.com/p/xmonad/issues/advsearch

BTW, is it only me or is google code's issue system better than github's?