
22 Dec
2014
22 Dec
'14
5:51 a.m.
On 23/01/2013, Dmitri Iouchtchenko
On 1/16/13, adam vogt
wrote: The patch works well, but I think it would be better to have: ...
Attached is a more elaborate patch bundle than before. It fixes an ...
For reference, the old message of mine that I'm replying to (with the attached bundle) is archived at https://www.haskell.org/pipermail/xmonad/2013-January/013467.html. Are there any objections to the last version of the changes? The bundle is almost two years old now, which means that I've been using the code for that long without any issues. There's been one patch since then that affects the same file, but a cursory glance didn't reveal any conflicts.