8 Nov
2007
8 Nov
'07
12:15 a.m.
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 03:45:41PM -0800, Don Stewart wrote:
I think then, hmm, that each extension module (all 72 of them...) need to have an example of how to insert its behaviour into the defaultConfig structure. (e.g. with M.union for bindings, and field setting for hooks).
Does that make sense?
Yes, it does indeed. I thought that it could be helpful installing a default xmonad.hs with all the XConfig records explicitly called when no xmonad.hs is found. This way each module could have something uniform to refer to. And what about the docstring stuff? As far as I understand it is not useful anymore, and we can get rid of it. Andrea