-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Brandon, On 15.11.2012 21:01, Brandon Allbery wrote:

On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Jochen Keil wrote:

...

the wikipedia article on xmonad states that it is (was?) planned to move to XCB "as soon as bindings are available". So, afais there are quite recent bindings [1]. Is there a good reason why nobody has started on this yet?

Wikipedia is apparently way behind. It was started, and it was stopped because xcb turns out to require a complete redesign of xmonad. Likewise, there is no intent to port xmonad to Wayland; it could not be done as a port, but requires a complete redesign from scratch.

Other people are welcome to do such redesigns if they wish.

thanks for your quick reply. Do you have a pointer to the discussion related to this? I'm curious how difficult it could get. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlClTPUACgkQtVwvsA+W4CA7RwCfXXHSaiU+VhDhxvFDoWdXXD66 y4wAoIBb6WVq6QdLC7ayNcGkcKBArpI0 =68PD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

The thing about doing wayland, is you DON'T want to just "do" wayland.  Wayland opens up many new possibilities and those possibilities should be engineered around.  Specifically, xmonad's layouts currently  return rectangles.  In wayland they should return quadrilaterals with their points floating in 3D space, and zoom levels as well.  Wayland gives us the ability to do things like the zoom layouts correctly, so they would actually make things bigger/smaller depending on focus :)  That would be COOL!!!  It is one of the biggest things I'm looking forward to in wayland. Timothy ---------- Původní zpráva ---------- Od: Erik de Castro Lopo Datum: 15. 11. 2012 Předmět: Re: [xmonad] Transition from Xlib to XCB "Brandon Allbery wrote:

On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Jochen Keil wrote:

...

the wikipedia article on xmonad states that it is (was?) planned to move to XCB "as soon as bindings are available". So, afais there are quite recent bindings [1]. Is there a good reason why nobody has started on this yet?

Wikipedia is apparently way behind. It was started, and it was stopped because xcb turns out to require a complete redesign of xmonad. Likewise, there is no intent to port xmonad to Wayland; it could not be done as a port, but requires a complete redesign from scratch.

Xmonad was originally redesigned for X11, but Brian McKenna has made it work with the Mac OS X native windowing API. Surely doing Wayland as well is not much more difficult than OS X? Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/(http://www.mega-nerd.com/) _______________________________________________ xmonad mailing list xmonad@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/xmonad (http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/xmonad)"