On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Gwern Branwen wrote:

On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 12:15 PM, wrote:

...

This has been sitting around in my local tree for about a year, after I wrote it for someone on #xmonad; it has vanished from hpaste since then and I never got around to submitting it to -contrib.

So no one's actually using this code?

Someone was at one point, but your point is taken; we're finding a type issue with it that I vaguely recall being an attempt to work around some ancient ghc weirdness that no longer applies, related to it insisting the declaration of onlyFor and the declaration of the LayoutModifier instance looking the same (which overconstrains it so it won't work when used in a chain with something else; removing the overconstraint works with current ghc). Forget this patch and I'll resubmit when we have it working again. (I can't test it locally beyond compiling it, yet; my environment is a complete mess.) -- brandon s allbery allbery.b@gmail.com wandering unix systems administrator (available) (412) 475-9364 vm/sms