Issue 98 in xmonad: Conventional configuration strategies
Issue 98: Conventional configuration strategies http://code.google.com/p/xmonad/issues/detail?id=98 Comment #1 by dons00: An example from Thomas. 1 -- Sample idea of what a non-xmonad/haskell config file might look like. 2 3 -- Set the modkey. 4 modkey = mod4 5 6 myConfig = { 7 borderWidth = 3 8 terminal = "urxvt +sb ...." 9 workspaces = "A", "B", "C", "D" 10 gaps = 15 0 0 0 11 modMask = modkey 12 .... 13 } 14 15 -- Layouts 16 layouts = tiled, mirror tiled, full (noBorders) 17 18 -- Keys 19 key a (shift) Kill 20 key right (control) rotview true 21 22 -- Mouse 23 mouse 1 focusNextWindow 24 25 -- Styles 26 Style (classname=Skype | resource=skype) StartWS A, Float 27 Style (classname=XClock) Float -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings
codesite-noreply@google.com writes:
Issue 98: Conventional configuration strategies http://code.google.com/p/xmonad/issues/detail?id=98
Comment #1 by dons00: An example from Thomas.
1 -- Sample idea of what a non-xmonad/haskell config file might look like. 2 3 -- Set the modkey. 4 modkey = mod4 5 6 myConfig = { 7 borderWidth = 3 8 terminal = "urxvt +sb ...." 9 workspaces = "A", "B", "C", "D" 10 gaps = 15 0 0 0 11 modMask = modkey 12 .... 13 } 14 15 -- Layouts 16 layouts = tiled, mirror tiled, full (noBorders) 17 18 -- Keys 19 key a (shift) Kill 20 key right (control) rotview true 21 22 -- Mouse 23 mouse 1 focusNextWindow 24 25 -- Styles 26 Style (classname=Skype | resource=skype) StartWS A, Float 27 Style (classname=XClock) Float
I am not sure what you mean by the word `conventional'. It sounds awkward to give up a well formed syntax with a yet-to-be-designed configuration scheme. And at the mean time, full screen mplayer still needs me to move it up and left one pixel respectively to achieve _full screen_. I think it largely depends on what you developers think which way xmonad is going to follow. Just look at those nearly full powered window managers out there. You have to admit that they all have very complicated configuration file syntax. Let's take an example of FVWM, which is still my favourite non-tiled window manager. Its man page has 9048 lines to educate people how the configuration file could be written, and that still not includes all other separate modules. Do you want users of xmonad to learn another strange configuration syntax? On the contrary, please look at Sawfish. I am glad some people finally continued the work, which had been halted for a couple of years. Think of it, what kind of configuration syntax could you imagine to achieve the flexibility, readability and usability given by a Lisp-based scripting language it uses? `Haskell' is my answer. What is yours? How /conventional/ the configuration strategy is really restricts how powerful and configurable xmonad is. Please think twice before you stepping upon the endless journey of implementing a new language that could be used to configure a powerful-WM-to-be. My two cents, Xiao-Yong -- c/* __o/* <\ * (__ */\ <
Hi --
On 09/12/2007, Xiao-Yong Jin
yet-to-be-designed configuration scheme. And at the mean time, full screen mplayer still needs me to move it up and left one pixel respectively to achieve _full screen_.
OK, that's not even tangential as it is off-topic.
I think it largely depends on what you developers think which way xmonad is going to follow. Just look at those nearly full powered window managers out there. You have to admit that they all have very complicated configuration file syntax. Let's take an example of FVWM, which is still my favourite non-tiled window manager. Its man page has 9048 lines to educate people how the configuration file could be written, and that still not includes all other separate modules.
Given I'm an expert at FVWM, I can tell you it's power is not about config files as it is more about the sheer number options it has. The two aren't even comparable here.
Do you want users of xmonad to learn another strange configuration syntax? On the contrary, please look
Strange? No? Enforced? No. There would be nothing stopping you from writing out the best haskell you could muster as an xmonad config file; it's just in many people's eyes enforcing a -language- onto people is a tall order, and yes, there is a huge difference between a config file and a language. -- Thomas Adam
participants (3)
-
codesite-noreply＠google.com -
Thomas Adam -
Xiao-Yong Jin