-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Don Stewart wrote:

They're in the default Config -- i.e. that binding is already in scope.

So people are intentionally duplicating parts of the default config for some reason.

I think this is quite different to the case where there is a spontaneous idiom appearing.

-- Don

You refer to just the ones duplicating the mod-t binding? I'd say it's an interesting example of how our keybinding system is suboptimal - even moderately competent users should not find themselves duplicating stuff like this. But anyway, even if you filter out the ones binding to xK_t, there're still 10 configs using this same function definition. Is that not enough? Before I invest anymore time in trying to make configs more concise & usable by factoring out commonalities, I'd appreciate some hard guidelines on when something is meritorious enough to be put in core and when it is not. - -- gwern -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Use GnuPG with Firefox : http://getfiregpg.org (Version: 0.7.5) iEYEAREKAAYFAkn9DpsACgkQvpDo5Pfl1oKF6gCeItWqEw6tOJZesV3ONrYWJmbB OcgAnjG98E+ZW1cwFmFUfjbfdjkNQRA3 =VybT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----