Issue 73 in xmonad: xmonad as a library
Issue 73: xmonad as a library http://code.google.com/p/xmonad/issues/detail?id=73 Comment #5 by dons00: Documentation done. Only thing left is an example, commented-out xmonad.hs users can use as a template. Issue attribute updates: Labels: -Priority-Medium Priority-Critical -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings
Add to that this effort to bring the manpage up to date: it still had stuff about non-greedy workspace switching and the compiling necessary for reconfiguration. It might be better to be a bit more verbose on configuration, and/or reference the other docs. * On Thursday, December 06 2007, codesite-noreply@google.com wrote:
Issue 73: xmonad as a library http://code.google.com/p/xmonad/issues/detail?id=73
Comment #5 by dons00: Documentation done. Only thing left is an example, commented-out xmonad.hs users can use as a template.
On Dec 7, 2007 5:32 PM, Adam Vogt
Add to that this effort to bring the manpage up to date: it still had stuff about non-greedy workspace switching and the compiling necessary for reconfiguration.
It might be better to be a bit more verbose on configuration, and/or reference the other docs.
Was this ever applied? I tried applying it but it seems to depend on an out-of-date patch. Can someone confirm whether this patch has or hasn't been applied? And if it hasn't, Adam, would you mind resubmitting the patch against the most recent darcs repo? Thanks, -Brent
* On Tuesday, December 18 2007, Brent Yorgey wrote:
Was this ever applied? I tried applying it but it seems to depend on an out-of-date patch. They aren't applied.
Can someone confirm whether this patch has or hasn't been applied? And if it hasn't, Adam, would you mind resubmitting the patch against the most recent darcs repo? Patch attached.
Maybe the section on configuration should be more verbose. And the version stated in the manpage needs updating for the next release.
On Tuesday 18 December 2007 20:46:44 Adam Vogt wrote:
* On Tuesday, December 18 2007, Brent Yorgey wrote:
Was this ever applied? I tried applying it but it seems to depend on an out-of-date patch.
They aren't applied.
Can someone confirm whether this patch has or hasn't been applied? And if it hasn't, Adam, would you mind resubmitting the patch against the most recent darcs repo?
Patch attached.
Maybe the section on configuration should be more verbose.
And the version stated in the manpage needs updating for the next release.
Applied, thanks. In the future, please send patches with a subject beginning in 'darcs patch'. I'm very careful to keep track of 'darcs patch' messages, but sometimes I lose track of other threads. Cheers, Spencer Janssen
participants (4)
-
Adam Vogt -
Brent Yorgey -
codesite-noreply＠google.com -
Spencer Janssen