Issue 24 in xmonad: focus moves correctly, but its visible indication is wrong

Issue 24: focus moves correctly, but its visible indication is wrong http://code.google.com/p/xmonad/issues/detail?id=24 New issue report by matthias.neubauer: What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. start xmonad 2. open xterm 3. open another xterm 4. move mouse cursor in second xterm What is the expected output? What do you see instead? - Expected output: I expect to move the focus (highlighted text cursor) together with the mouse from the first window to the second. - Instead, the focus (highlighted text cursor) stays in the first window *and* moves to the second window What version of the product are you using? On what operating system? - darcs checkout from yesterday (2006-06-15) - os x 10.4.9 an a powerbook g4 1ghz Please provide any additional information below. If this error is due to a module from XMonadContrib, please tag this issue with 'Component- Contrib' below. Issue attributes: Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings

codesite-noreply:
Issue 24: focus moves correctly, but its visible indication is wrong http://code.google.com/p/xmonad/issues/detail?id=24
Thanks Matthias.
New issue report by matthias.neubauer: What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. start xmonad 2. open xterm 3. open another xterm 4. move mouse cursor in second xterm
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
- Expected output: I expect to move the focus (highlighted text cursor) together with the mouse from the first window to the second.
- Instead, the focus (highlighted text cursor) stays in the first window *and* moves to the second window
Yes, I was able to reproduce this with xterm. I note however that urxvt *doesn't* have a problem here. We're going to put this down as an xterm bug for now (since we encourage the use of urxvt anyway). So, a solution (and better in the long run) is to update to rxvt-unicode (it also handles resize much better). http://software.schmorp.de/pkg/rxvt-unicode.html Cheers, Don
participants (2)
-
codesite-noreply@google.com
-
dons@cse.unsw.edu.au