I'll shut up after this, but why have two modules, why not just have Util.Scratchpad with all this stuff in it? shepheb, anyone else object to that, aside from that it would mean deleting an existing module (NamedScratchpad)? It's so new that doesn't seem like a big deal to me. Just seems to me that they are so much the same that that having everything in mone module would be best. -- wmw

On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Konstantin Sobolev wrote:

On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:58 PM, Wirt Wolff wrote:

...

I'll shut up after this, but why have two modules, why not just have Util.Scratchpad with all this stuff in it? shepheb, anyone else object to that, aside from that it would mean deleting an existing module (NamedScratchpad)? It's so new that doesn't seem like a big deal to me. Just seems to me that they are so much the same that that having everything in mone module would be best.

OK, I was trying to avoid NamedScratchpad clashing with the Scratchpad and to keep Scratchpad API. Many people use it I think, I wouldn't like to break their configs. So what should I do now, keep them as 2 modules but make all NamedScrathpad functions shorter, merge them into one Scratchpad module and keep NS functions prefixed with 'named'  or something else? I don't have my own preference.

So, any suggestions on this one? Keep 2 modules and make NS names shorter, squeeze them into one, or may be something else?