I don't mind whether patches are sent to me or the list, I have to apply them to the repo in the end anyway ;-) - email programs tend to break patches so they need to be zipped/targzed. - we've been getting patches at an incredibly rate, which is great. But it might be more sensible if people grouped together their patches into a 'release'. Which is to say something that they think should work to some degree. This would mean a) The repo would always contain (mostly) working software b) I wouldn't have to deal with quite so many patches ;-) Thoughts? Tom Neil Mitchell wrote:
Hi,
What do the people on this list want, should patches be sent to this list, or direct to Tom (shackell -AT- cs.york.ac.uk) ? If people would rather leave this list open for discussion, then maybe we need a yhc-patches@ list for people to send patches on?
Thoughts?
Neil _______________________________________________ Yhc mailing list Yhc@haskell.org http://haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/yhc