19 Jan
2006
19 Jan
'06
7:12 a.m.
Krasimir Angelov wrote:
I can write a manually implementation for tuple of size 1 but I wonder wheter the generation of such tuples can be avoided. If you have to pass the (x) tuple to somewhere then you can simply pass the value of x instead. In addition all pattern matchings for (x) should be removed.
Cheers, Krasimir
Yes, the 1 tuple is entirely redundant, however, given the compiler uses tuples for every other size of dictionary it would be a nuisance to add lots of special case code in the compiler to optimise away the one tuple. Thanks Tom