26 Jul
2011
26 Jul
'11
6:39 a.m.
Take a look at Min by Stephen Tse. http://min-lang.blogspot.com/ On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Davi Santos <dps.abc@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello, which would be the minimal Haskell concepts subset equivalent to a Turing-complete high level language? I bet there would be no monads and type classes in the subset. Please, see that I am not an idealist nor want to use the acclaimed very powerful abstraction capabilities of Haskell. I just need to know how much is strictly needed, even if a real Haskeller or other person couldn't understand my code. Davi _______________________________________________ Beginners mailing list Beginners@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners
-- -- Regards, KC