May 2008 - cabal-devel

[Hackage] #240: setup install does not preserve MacOS X resource forks
by Hackage 11 Sep '09

11 Sep '09

#240: setup install does not preserve MacOS X resource forks ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Reporter: guest | Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Cabal library | Version: 1.2.3.0 Severity: normal | Keywords: Difficulty: normal | Ghcversion: 6.8.2 Platform: | ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- I use the attached Setup.lhs file to do some Mac-related magic (which I unfortunately do not understand) on files built with wxhaskell on MacOS X. The key point about this magic is that it allows me to run a GUI from the command line. Without doing the magic, the GUI will open, but it will not react to any user interaction. I think the problem is that whatever mechanism we use to copy the binary over (say to /usr/local/bin) does not preserve the magic. That is, if I run it directly after a runhaskell Setup install, I get the non-reactive GUI. If I do a cp geni /usr/local/bin by hand, then the GUI reacts, presumably because on MacOS X cp also copies the magic over. Sorry for being so vague. Let me know if I can help in any way. -- Eric Kow -- Ticket URL: <http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/hackage/ticket/240> Hackage <http://haskell.org/cabal/> Hackage: Cabal and related projects

1 4

[Hackage] #274: Add a 'build from sdist tarball' feature
by Hackage 23 Aug '09

23 Aug '09

#274: Add a 'build from sdist tarball' feature ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Reporter: guest | Owner: Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: low | Milestone: Component: Cabal library | Version: 1.2.3.0 Severity: normal | Keywords: Difficulty: normal | Ghcversion: 6.8.2 Platform: | ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- I've often seen Darcs repos where the sdist tarball was incomplete, or where a person had a tarball which was incomplete. I think this is because most people just never use the tarball; if they do ever use it, it's because it's what was downloaded from Hackage. The reason is that doing so is much more complex than 'configure; build; install': you need to configure, create an sdist tarball, cd into dist/; do a tar -xvf or whatever of the correct tarball; cd into *that* - and then you can configure/build/install. Assuming it is a working tarball. Now, of course you can automate it. After the first dozen times, I wrote myself a shellscript to do all that for me: function build_sdist { clean_configure && sdist && cd dist/ && untar *.tar.gz && cd `ls -t ./ | grep "/" | head -n 1` && clean_configure && build && hinstall; haddock && hinstall; } (This is pretty long and imperfect, but it would be even longer if all the other aliases and function definitions were included; I think they're pretty straightforwardly named though, so I haven't included them.) It seems to me that this would be, at the very least, a useful adjunct to cabal check - if it makes sense to see whether various fields are filled out sanely, surely it makes sense to see whether needed files are included/listed? It might be even better to make the normal 'runhaskell Setup build' do it from sdist, but this is harder to code (besides the forgoing, you'd need to copy in the configuration from the top-level, from when the user ran 'runhaskell Setup configure' and added whatever options) and possibly more confusing ("But Foo.hs *is* there, right there in src/! Why can't Cabal find it?"). So I'd be satisfied to do something like 'cabal checkdist'. -- gwern -- Ticket URL: <http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/hackage/ticket/274> Hackage <http://haskell.org/cabal/> Hackage: Cabal and related projects

1 5

[Hackage] #199: when installing a new version of GHC, there should be a way to upgrade my packages
by Hackage 18 Jul '09

18 Jul '09

#199: when installing a new version of GHC, there should be a way to upgrade my packages ---------------------------------+------------------------------------------ Reporter: guest | Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: cabal-install tool | Version: 1.2.3.0 Severity: normal | Keywords: Difficulty: normal | Ghcversion: 6.8.2 Platform: Linux | ---------------------------------+------------------------------------------ If I have version 6.6 of GHC installed, with packages foo, bar, and bang, and I install ghc 6.8, I'd like a way to automatically install foo, bar, and bang. This could be part of GHC's installation script possibly, or maybe a feature of cabal install. cabal can check the installed packages for the previous version of GHC and "cabal install" them. -- Ticket URL: <http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/hackage/ticket/199> Hackage <http://haskell.org/cabal/> Hackage: Cabal and related projects

1 10

[Hackage] #273: Provide a stable address for current Haddock documentation
by Hackage 11 Jun '09

11 Jun '09

#273: Provide a stable address for current Haddock documentation ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Reporter: guest | Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Cabal library | Version: 1.2.3.0 Severity: normal | Keywords: Difficulty: normal | Ghcversion: 6.8.2 Platform: | ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Documentation for version 0.1.1 of the Derive package is at http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/derive/0.1.1/doc/html/ - but as soon as I upload a new version any documentation links will become out of date. It would be very useful if there was a stable URL where the documentation of the latest version of a package could be found. -- Neil Mitchell -- Ticket URL: <http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/hackage/ticket/273> Hackage <http://haskell.org/cabal/> Hackage: Cabal and related projects

1 4

[Hackage] #185: Temporary executables leave foo.exe.manifest files behind
by Hackage 02 Jun '09

02 Jun '09

#185: Temporary executables leave foo.exe.manifest files behind ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Reporter: guest | Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Cabal | Version: HEAD Severity: normal | Keywords: Difficulty: normal | Ghcversion: 6.8.1 Platform: Windows | ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- When Cabal creates and runs a temporary program, as it appears to do with hsc when running over the base libraries doing haddock, it leaves a manifest behind in dist. On Windows, ghc --make with 6.8.1 produces a foo.exe and a foo.exe.manifest. Cabal deletes the former, but not the latter. Very minor, but should be easy to fix too. -- Ticket URL: <http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/hackage/ticket/185> Hackage <http://haskell.org/cabal/> Hackage: Cabal and related projects

1 2

[Hackage] #231: "buildable: False" should fail the current configuration
by Hackage 27 Apr '09

27 Apr '09

#231: "buildable: False" should fail the current configuration ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Reporter: duncan | Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Cabal library | Version: 1.2.3.0 Severity: normal | Keywords: Difficulty: normal | Ghcversion: 6.8.2 Platform: | ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Currently resolving configurations does not take account of the `buildable` field. It should act rather like `build-depends: non- existant`, though with a different error message. If possible the error message should relate to the guard condition expression (the conjunction if there are several nested guards). At the moment it is not considered at all and we don't notice that the package cannot be built until the build step, rather than the configure step. One problem is that it's not clear if `buildable: False` is always fatal. People sometimes do that for test executables that are not supposed to be installed. So what should the behaviour be? The lib or only exe failing to configure must be an error. -- Ticket URL: <http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/hackage/ticket/231> Hackage <http://haskell.org/cabal/> Hackage: Cabal and related projects

1 5

[Hackage] #266: cabal haddock plus cpp preprocessing with relative #include files
by Hackage 17 Mar '09

17 Mar '09

#266: cabal haddock plus cpp preprocessing with relative #include files ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Reporter: guest | Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Cabal library | Version: HEAD Severity: normal | Keywords: Difficulty: normal | Ghcversion: 6.8.2 Platform: | ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- All these bugs are against the homeomorphic library I have written. To play along, you can do darcs get --partial http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/fp/darcs/homeomorphic Bug 2: cabal haddock fails $ cabal haddock Preprocessing library homeomorphic-0.1... Running Haddock for homeomorphic-0.1... Warning: The documentation for the following packages are not installed. No links will be generated to these packages: base-3.0.1.0, QuickCheck-1.1.0.0, mtl-1.1.0.0, containers-0.1.0.1 dist/build/tmp/Data/Homeomorphic/Hash1.hs:4:0: Include/Hash.hs: No such file or directory This one may well be my fault, if some extra magic is required for the haddock with CPP, but not the building - but that seems weird, if there is enough info to build the file, surely there is enough info to haddock it Duncan says: Right, there is no such guarantee at the moment. That's because ghc --make can find things by import chasing where Cabal needs more stuff specified explicitly. One day when Cabal does the import chasing they'll be consistent. In this case though it doesn't look like on of those problems. It seems to be because for haddock we're copying files to dist/ and then running cpp on them. That means of course that relative #includes do not work. It's not entirely clear to me why we are copying them before running cpp and not just running cpp on the files from their original locations. Please file a ticket for this one. -- Ticket URL: <http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/hackage/ticket/266> Hackage <http://haskell.org/cabal/> Hackage: Cabal and related projects

1 3

[Hackage] #188: file extensions
by Hackage 16 Mar '09

16 Mar '09

#188: file extensions --------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Reporter: guest | Owner: Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Cabal | Version: 1.2.2.0 Severity: normal | Keywords: Difficulty: normal | Ghcversion: 6.8.1 Platform: Linux | --------------------------+------------------------------------------------- GHC ignores Objective C sources unless -x c is passed to it on the command line before the source files. As far as I could tell there is no way to pass that option to GHC through Cabal so no .m files ever get built (well.. not completely true - setting ghc-options works but that breaks compilation of Haskell code). One way to get this to work would be to just add some extra code in Cabal to automatically pass -x c for .m files. This is probably a bad idea as someone might want or need to compile files using some other extension at some point. Another option is add some way of specifying compile options on a per-file (or group of files) basis: setting ghc-options to -x c just for one set of files. Still very limited but it's an improvement over the first option. Third option I can think of is to add a way of specifying compiler/extension pairs in Cabal so given compilers are automatically used to compile files with corresponding extensions. Depending on how much time I have I might look into adding this functionality myself but would like some feedback on which approach to take. Otherwise I might have to stick with autotools and ignore Cabal until it gets a bit more mature and flexible. -- Ticket URL: <http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/hackage/ticket/188> Hackage <http://haskell.org/cabal/> Hackage: Cabal and related projects

1 6

[Hackage] #263: Multiple compilers of the same version confuse Cabal
by Hackage 07 Mar '09

07 Mar '09

#263: Multiple compilers of the same version confuse Cabal ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Reporter: guest | Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Cabal library | Version: 1.2.3.0 Severity: normal | Keywords: Difficulty: normal | Ghcversion: 6.8.2 Platform: | ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- It often happens that two or more copies of the same version of the same compiler are installed on a system. For example, the compiler can be installed with an installation package, or be built from the source tarball, or from darcs, or using MacPorts. If a package is installed for each of these copies of the compiler while allowing Cabal to use the default installation location each time, Cabal will always use the exact same folder. This leads to mayhem and anarchy. Proposed solution: Cabal should also use the base path of the compiler when it constructs the directory name for the package, not just the compiler name and version. For example: If I install a package foo-1.2.3.4 --with- compiler=/opt/local/bin/ghc-6.8.2 and the installation base path is /usr/local, then Cabal should install the package into /usr/local/foo-1.2.3.4/opt_local_ghc-6.8.2 -- Ticket URL: <http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/hackage/ticket/263> Hackage <http://haskell.org/cabal/> Hackage: Cabal and related projects

1 4

[Hackage] #238: haddock2 is not passed -D__HADDOCK__ or cpp-options
by Hackage 03 Mar '09

03 Mar '09

#238: haddock2 is not passed -D__HADDOCK__ or cpp-options ----------------------------------+----------------------------------------- Reporter: ross(a)soi.city.ac.uk | Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Cabal library | Version: 1.2.3.0 Severity: normal | Keywords: Difficulty: normal | Ghcversion: 6.8.2 Platform: | ----------------------------------+----------------------------------------- With haddock-1, Cabal invokes cpp, passing it ARCH and OS defines, -D__HADDOCK__ and the contents of cpp-options. However haddock-2 invokes cpp itself via the GHC API, which passes this cpp the ARCH and OS defines, but it doesn't get the others. It might also be a good idea to give __HADDOCK__ a numeric value, because GHC extensions need not be hidden from the new one. -- Ticket URL: <http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/hackage/ticket/238> Hackage <http://haskell.org/cabal/> Hackage: Cabal and related projects

1 3