February 2009 - cabal-devel

[Hackage] #463: Do not work in Windows Vista
by Hackage 22 Dec '09

22 Dec '09

#463: Do not work in Windows Vista ---------------------------------+------------------------------------------ Reporter: Tonal | Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: cabal-install-0.6 Component: cabal-install tool | Version: 1.2.3.0 Severity: normal | Keywords: Difficulty: normal | Ghcversion: 6.10.1 Platform: | ---------------------------------+------------------------------------------ My Environment: Os: Windows Vista Home Ru + sp1 User name: Леново ghc 6.10.1 (Cabal-1.6.0.1 from installation) cabal-install-0.6.0 Other lib: HTTP-3001.1.5 zlib-0.5.0.0 Cabal-install compile and link. Bat all commands not work. For example: {{{ C:\Lang\Haskell\ghc>cabal list Config file C:\Users\Леново\AppData\Roaming\cabal\config not found. Writing default configuration to C:\Users\Леново\AppData\Roaming\cabal\config cabal: CreateDirectory: does not exist (!8AB5<5 =5 C405BAO =09B8 C:070==K9 ?CBL.) }}} -- Ticket URL: <http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/hackage/ticket/463> Hackage <http://haskell.org/cabal/> Hackage: Cabal and related projects

1 6

[Hackage] #445: Simple builds ignore .buildinfo
by Hackage 22 Dec '09

22 Dec '09

#445: Simple builds ignore .buildinfo ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Reporter: awick | Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Cabal library | Version: 1.6.0.1 Severity: normal | Keywords: Difficulty: normal | Ghcversion: 6.8.3 Platform: | ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- It would be convenient if Simple builds would look for buildinfo files, instead of just ignoring them. It's sometimes convenient to have the configure script run as a separate phase (for example, when you're configuring a bunch of separate cabal packages) instead of re-running the same configure tests every time, and this would help. There's an obvious workaround (setting the type to 'Configure' and then adding an empty 'configure' script), but this is tedious. I've attached a simple example. The .buildinfo file tells Cabal to build Test2 in addition to Test1. If you set the type to Simple, it only builds Test1. If you set it to 'Configure', it runs the empty configure script and then builds both Test1 and Test2. It'd be nicer if 'Simple' caused both Test1 and Test2 to be built, as well. -- Ticket URL: <http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/hackage/ticket/445> Hackage <http://haskell.org/cabal/> Hackage: Cabal and related projects

1 3

[Hackage] #429: Strange error that seems related to repos field in config
by Hackage 22 Dec '09

22 Dec '09

#429: Strange error that seems related to repos field in config ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Reporter: waern | Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Cabal library | Version: 1.6.0.1 Severity: normal | Keywords: Difficulty: normal | Ghcversion: 6.10.1 Platform: | ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- I'm reporting this although I don't really know what the problem is. I installed cabal-install using GHC 6.10.1. When I tried to use it, it complained that the it couldn't open the file 'Ê', or some other strange, seemingly random, one-character long file name. An strace revealed that just before trying to open the file it reads the repos: field from the config file in ~/.cabal. That field was set to "hackage.haskell.org:http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive". I tried removing the initial "hackage.haskell.org:", and them cabal-install works. Not sure what this is, but I couldn't find something about it in the bug tracker after a quick search. -- Ticket URL: <http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/hackage/ticket/429> Hackage <http://haskell.org/cabal/> Hackage: Cabal and related projects

1 3

[Hackage] #427: how to access temporary build-files/logs?
by Hackage 22 Dec '09

22 Dec '09

#427: how to access temporary build-files/logs? ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Reporter: claus | Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Cabal library | Version: 1.6.0.1 Severity: normal | Keywords: Difficulty: normal | Ghcversion: 6.8.3 Platform: | ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- when trying to debug an installation failure, it would be most useful to be able to keep the temporary build files (similar to ghc's -keep* options). Apart from being able to look at things like `config.log`, it would also allow to experiment with patched commands from the verbose build log (which needs the temporary files still present). -- Ticket URL: <http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/hackage/ticket/427> Hackage <http://haskell.org/cabal/> Hackage: Cabal and related projects

1 9

[Hackage] #216: need a way to specify the foreign libraries a package depends on
by Hackage 22 Dec '09

22 Dec '09

#216: need a way to specify the foreign libraries a package depends on ----------------------------------+----------------------------------------- Reporter: ross(a)soi.city.ac.uk | Owner: Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Cabal library | Version: 1.2.3.0 Severity: major | Keywords: Difficulty: normal | Ghcversion: 6.8.2 Platform: Linux | ----------------------------------+----------------------------------------- Package descriptions allow one to specify which Haskell libraries a package depends on, but foreign ones. Designing something that can be used with native package managers is complicated because many of them alter the upstream library names in unpredictable ways. -- Ticket URL: <http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/hackage/ticket/216> Hackage <http://haskell.org/cabal/> Hackage: Cabal and related projects

1 11

[Hackage] #372: cabal sdist --snapshot does not work, while ./setup sdist snapshot does
by Hackage 22 Dec '09

22 Dec '09

#372: cabal sdist --snapshot does not work, while ./setup sdist snapshot does ---------------------------------+------------------------------------------ Reporter: nomeata | Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: cabal-install tool | Version: Severity: normal | Keywords: Difficulty: normal | Ghcversion: 6.8.2 Platform: Linux | ---------------------------------+------------------------------------------ Hi, cabal sdist has a bug, which does not appear when using Setup.lhs {{{ $ cabal clean cleaning... $ cabal sdist --snapshot Warning: Cannot run preprocessors. Run 'configure' command first. Building source dist for free-theorems-0.2.1.20081016... cabal: dist/src/free-theorems-0.2.1: getDirectoryContents: does not exist (No such file or directory) $ runhaskell Setup.lhs sdist --snapshot Warning: Cannot run preprocessors. Run 'configure' command first. Building source dist for free-theorems-0.2.1.20081016... Source tarball created: dist/free-theorems-0.2.1.20081016.tar.gz $ cat Setup.lhs #!/usr/bin/env runhaskell > import Distribution.Simple > main = defaultMain }}} Using cabal-install 0.6.0, Cabal 1.6.0.1, ghc 6.8.2. I haven’t looked at the code, but I assume it’s a simple mistake. -- Ticket URL: <http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/hackage/ticket/372> Hackage <http://haskell.org/cabal/> Hackage: Cabal and related projects

1 3

[Hackage] #299: Add changelog feature to hackagedb
by Hackage 22 Dec '09

22 Dec '09

#299: Add changelog feature to hackagedb --------------------------------+------------------------------------------- Reporter: guest | Owner: Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: hackageDB website | Version: 1.2.3.0 Severity: normal | Keywords: Difficulty: normal | Ghcversion: 6.8.2 Platform: | --------------------------------+------------------------------------------- It would be great if releases on hackagedb were required (or even permitted) to include short descriptions of the changes made since the last release. Currently there is no easy way to get this information for most packages, since many packages have no home page other than their hackagedb page. -- Ticket URL: <http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/hackage/ticket/299> Hackage <http://haskell.org/cabal/> Hackage: Cabal and related projects

1 10

[Hackage] #478: allow comments on any line, don't require '.' for blank lines
by Hackage 19 Dec '09

19 Dec '09

#478: allow comments on any line, don't require '.' for blank lines ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Reporter: duncan | Owner: Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Cabal-1.8 Component: Cabal library | Version: 1.6.0.1 Severity: normal | Keywords: Difficulty: unknown | Ghcversion: Platform: | ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- It confuses people that in `.cabal` files, comments can only appear on lines on their own, and not at the end of other lines. We should consider relaxing this as long as it can be done in a backwards compatible way. The only thing to worry about is command line flags like: {{{ cc-options: --some-flag }}} If we required a space after the `--` that might be sufficient. There are some tools that interpret `--` on its own as an argument, but usually only as a separator between flag arguments and non-flag arguments and we do not expect those to be given in .cabal files. We might like to allow `--` within quotes eg `"--"` however that's also not easy because of the syntax and format of .cabal files. They have no consistent lexical syntax, each field is parsed separately. The overall structure is parsed based on layout without parsing individual fields. In particular .cabal files are not tokenised. The second issue is easier. The original specification required that blank lines within a field include a leading `.` character. This applies to multi-paragraph descriptions. This syntax is totally unnecessary. The parser could cope fine without it. We should accept the convention for backwards compatibility but also allow ordinary blank lines. Multiple blank lines within a field should still be collapsed to one, and trailing blank lines within a field should be trimmed. -- Ticket URL: <http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/hackage/ticket/478> Hackage <http://haskell.org/cabal/> Hackage: Cabal and related projects

1 5

[Hackage] #171: Add command to automagically create an initial cabal package
by Hackage 18 Dec '09

18 Dec '09

#171: Add command to automagically create an initial cabal package --------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Reporter: guest | Owner: Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Cabal | Version: 1.2.2.0 Severity: normal | Keywords: Difficulty: normal | Ghcversion: 6.6 Platform: Linux | --------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Don Stewart has a nice tool called mkcabal (http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~dons/code/mkcabal/) which creates an initial cabal package. It would be nice to have this built into the 'cabal' program itself so that "cabal create" or "cabal init" or similar would interactively create a cabal package. -- Ticket URL: <http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/hackage/ticket/171> Hackage <http://haskell.org/cabal/> Hackage: Cabal and related projects

1 7

[Hackage] #484: generalise version range syntax
by Hackage 18 Dec '09

18 Dec '09

#484: generalise version range syntax ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Reporter: duncan | Owner: Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Cabal-1.8 Component: Cabal library | Version: 1.6.0.1 Severity: normal | Keywords: Difficulty: unknown | Ghcversion: Platform: | ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- The internal version range syntax allows arbitrary unions and intersections. The parser only allows two clauses and no brackets. See: http://haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2009-January/054049.html {{{ I'm having some difficulty specifying dependencies in my .cabal file for a package I'm looking to upload to hackage soon. The difficulty is as follows. I basically want to specify parsec (>= 2.1 && < 3.0.0) || (> 3.0.0 && < 4) }}} I suggest we allow any number of clauses and brackets, to match the internal representation. We could also add `/=` or `!=` syntax since that is also easy to represent. It is harder to translate into other representations however we have a new view in terms of version ranges which should make it easier to do translations and to discover when the version range has more detail than can be represented in the target language (and maybe even approximate in such situations). -- Ticket URL: <http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/hackage/ticket/484> Hackage <http://haskell.org/cabal/> Hackage: Cabal and related projects

1 1