14 May
2001
14 May
'01
5:23 p.m.
* Silly combinations like "an unsafe label" or "a dynamic import with a given C-name" don't exist.
But now we have all new silly combinations, like foreign export "dynexp" foo :: ... and foreign export "dynimp" foo :: .... and foreign export "&foo" foo :: ... the extent field needs to be separated into import-extent and export-extent, I think. Can we make the "static" optional? It wouldn't introduce any ambiguity, and it would save characters in the common case. I like '&', but I'm less sure about '!' - this feels like we're getting a little too cryptic. Cheers, Simon