16 Apr
2004
16 Apr
'04
5:53 p.m.
Sven Panne <Sven.Panne@aedion.de> writes:
Fergus Henderson wrote:
[...] the Haskell FFI has sacrificed quality for easy of implementation. If this starts causing problems for users, I think the right solution is to raise the bar for implementations, not to lower it. [...]
P.S. to Malcolm: I did not mention nhc98, because I don't know how its back-end works, not because of an evil master plan against nhc98... :-)
S'okay. nhc98's default backend always compiles via C, and therefore FFI declarations that use macros will work in much the expected way (I think). Regards, Malcolm