Why are you saying that? I think, Moritz is right. Hadrian is supposed to be the build system for 8.4. Adding new functionality for cross-compilation to the old build system is frustrating. Manuel
Brandon Allbery <allbery.b@gmail.com>:
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 5:02 AM, Moritz Angermann <moritz.angermann@gmail.com <mailto:moritz.angermann@gmail.com>> wrote: However, I am now again at the point where I start hacking on the build system, while Hadrian is imminent. And this is quite depressing
Realistically, while Hadrian going into the tree may be imminent, as I understand it Hadrian becoming the primary build system --- or even a viable alternative build system --- is not. It's more of a repo logistics speed bump. Just let it go for now.
-- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allbery.b@gmail.com <mailto:allbery.b@gmail.com> ballbery@sinenomine.net <mailto:ballbery@sinenomine.net> unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net <http://sinenomine.net/>_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs