I'm not sure what the criteria are either, but I guess DeriveAnyClass is
comparable to the other extensions mentioned.
Cheers,
Pedro
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Simon Peyton Jones
| ...which of the following language extensions (which are mentioned in | T4437) are deemed stable enough to be registered in Cabal for GHC | 7.10?
I'm not sure what criteria you'd like to use!
PatternSynonyms, PartialTypeSignatures, and NamedWildCards are all pretty stable and should go in.
StaticPointers will definitely continue to be there in future; but the details of the API may change, and the current implementation is very much a prototype.
DeriveAnyClass: I defer to Pedro
Simon
| -----Original Message----- | From: Herbert Valerio Riedel [mailto:hvriedel@gmail.com] | Sent: 18 December 2014 22:14 | To: Simon Peyton Jones | Cc: Johan Tibell; Austin Seipp; Duncan Coutts | Subject: Which language extensions to register for Cabal 1.22? | | Hello Simon, | | ...which of the following language extensions (which are mentioned in | T4437) are deemed stable enough to be registered in Cabal for GHC | 7.10? | | - "DeriveAnyClass" | - "PatternSynonyms" | - "PartialTypeSignatures" | - "NamedWildcards" | - "StaticPointers" | | Cheers, | hvr _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs