Am So 26.07.2026 19:39 schrieb Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs:
I have framed the draft policy so that it is explicitly agnostic about whether LLMs are, in themselves, good or bad.
[…]
I personally do not want to express or institutionalise a second-class status for LLM-assisted contributions.
[…]
adding language to say that (in this context) “authorship” does not mean “typed every word”.
[…]
*Recommend* writing it yourself. […] I have framed it as a recommendation only.
[…]
Perhaps in due course we’ll want a channel for LLM-only reviews
My impression is that with every new revision the policy is watered down more. After the first iteration, I wrote that, while I’m not happy with the resulting policy, I think that it could at least be a preliminary compromise that would allow us to move forward together. Regarding the current version of the policy, my personal opinion is that it isn’t appropriate as such a compromise anymore. All the best, Wolfgang