
I just saw this comment, https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/41#issuecomment-28792472... https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/41#issuecomment-28792472... Did you mean to assign me both Eval class and pattern synonym constructors? I’m trying to formulate an evaluation of #42 in isolation from #41 but I don’t think this is what you intended and rather that I should be discussing 41 and 42, not 42 and Eval class.
On Mar 20, 2017, at 6:24 PM, Joachim Breitner
wrote: Hi,
this is your secretary speaking:
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/27 and https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/42 was brought before the committee. The proposals are related, so it makes sense to decide on them at once.
I propose Chris as the Shepherd. (But this was a relatively arbitrary decision, and Chris, if you are unhappy with this, I can arbitrary appoint someone else.)
Chris, please reach consensus as described in https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process
I suggest you make a recommendation about the decision, maybe point out debatable points, and assume that anyone who stays quiet agrees with you.
FYI, the oher proposals under discussion at the moment are:
Hex Floats Shephard: Iavor https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/37 Current tendency of the committee: In favor.
INCOMPLETE_CONTEXTS Shephard: Roman https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/34 Current tendency of the committee: Against.
Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de • https://www.joachim-breitner.de/ XMPP: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de • OpenPGP-Key: 0xF0FBF51F Debian Developer: nomeata@debian.org