* I agree with “hitting master”. * The “implemented status does not need to be 100% up to date; but it would be good to explain how to ask for a proposal to be moved from “accepted” to “implemented”. * There should be a link in the “timeline” list on https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals, so that people can find the list. Perhaps “6. Later, someone may implement the proposal. We count it as “implemented” when it hits the GHC mater banch” <link> THanks! Simon From: Vitaly Bragilevsky <bravit111@gmail.com> Sent: 03 December 2018 16:41 To: Joachim Breitner <mail@joachim-breitner.de> Cc: Simon Peyton Jones <simonpj@microsoft.com>; ghc-steering-committee <ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org> Subject: Re: GHC proposals Hi, I've fixed "under discussion" list and added "Non-proposal" label. I am volunteering to keep track of the implemented proposals with "Implemented" label. I think hitting master is the right time to consider the proposal implemented, are there other ideas on that? Vitaly On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 8:24 AM Vitaly Bragilevsky <bravit111@gmail.com<mailto:bravit111@gmail.com>> wrote: Vitaly, how about we delete the Proposal tag, and maybe mark non- proposals with a tag (maybe with a grey or dull color). Given that most pull requests are proposals, let’s mark the exceptions instead! Ok, I'll do that. Sorry for messing things up, I wanted to count all proposals but took a longer road. Vitaly