Can I draw your attention to
https://github.com/haskell/core-libraries-committee/issues/325#issuecomment-...
?
The CLC plan to revisit the proposal, and while continued discussion here
is fine, I don't think we could act until the CLC concludes. My thought:
let's move this back to "under revision" rather than shepherd it to a
conclusion.
We (maybe Adam or Matthias?) should write to the authors to explain this.
In a sympathetic and supportive way -- I think we all want to see Haskell
progress towards beauty and not just keep bad warts; but it's just a tricky
one.
Simon
On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 at 08:50, Matthías Páll Gissurarson via
ghc-steering-committee
Thank you all! This is a slightly nuanced one, so I’ll write a summary today for us to vote on.
/Matti Palli
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 09:39 Adam Gundry via ghc-steering-committee < ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org> wrote:
Dear Committee,
Benjamin proposes to revive and move forward the Monad of No Return proposal:
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/687
https://github.com/L0neGamer/ghc-proposals/blob/amending-mrp/proposals/0000-...
I'd like to nominate Matthías as the shepherd.
Please guide us to a conclusion as outlined in https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process
Cheers,
Adam
-- Adam Gundry, Haskell Consultant Well-Typed LLP, https://www.well-typed.com/
Registered in England & Wales, OC335890 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX, England https://www.google.com/maps/search/27+Old+Gloucester+Street,+London+WC1N+3AX,+England?entry=gmail&source=g _______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee
_______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee