I haven't been pushing this forwards mainly because I don't have the
bandwidth myself to work on the implementation, but if someone else is able
to do that, that would be great.
There are some details of the spec to iron out. One is a syntactic
decision - whether to use a new keyword "mutable" to indicate mutable
fields or not - I'll request comments on the proposal. There are other
details of the spec to iron out related to the implementation, but I think
it'll be easier to work through those by starting on a prototype.
Cheers
Simon
On 3 February 2017 at 23:37, Joachim Breitner
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 03.02.2017, 15:29 -0800 schrieb Iavor Diatchki:
Hello,
I am not sure what's the process for this,
it should be labeled as “under review discussion”, ideally by the author if the author thinks it is ready for that.
Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de • https://www.joachim-breitner.de/ XMPP: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de • OpenPGP-Key: 0xF0FBF51F Debian Developer: nomeata@debian.org _______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee