[ghc-steering-committee] Intended meaning of "Needs revision" label

Hi all, I've so far essentially been using the "Needs revision" label to indicate that the next concrete step has to be taken by the author, regardless of how big the changes I suggest are. After I did this yesterday, VitWW commented https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/621#issuecomment-2523299..., essentially saying it's only intended for cases where major rewrites are required.

From what I can tell, in past proposals, if relatively minor changes came up during the shepherding phase, sometimes "Needs revision" was used, and sometimes not.

Is there a guideline I should follow, or that you tend to follow here? Jakob