I vote *accept*. It’s better to have a specification that works rather than one that gives rise to bugs we don’t know how to fix, and the evidence laid out in the proposal suggests that this would have minimal impact on the ecosystem. With static pointers being more broadly used for Cabal hooks, we’re better served by a clear specification and simpler implementation. /Matti Palli On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 07:07 Jakob Brünker <jakob.bruenker@gmail.com> wrote:
Hey all,
our own Simon Peyton Jones proposes to simplify static pointers:
Static pointers are a feature <https://ghc.gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/doc/users_guide/exts/static_pointers.html> that allows you to get pointers to expressions that are valid across different processes and machines.
Allowing these expressions to reference certain types of local bindings has been producing issues that are hard to fix. The proposal suggests that instead we could just not allow that - simplifying both the specification and the implementation without placing a large burden on users (e.g. bindings can just be moved to the top level instead).
See the proposal itself for details: https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/blob/wip/spj-static/proposals...
I recommend *acceptance*. The cost of trying to figure out how to support the current spec is not worth the fairly marginal gain over the proposed simplification.
It would be great if I could get your responses on this by December 10.
Thanks, Jakob
On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 1:54 PM Adam Gundry <adam@well-typed.com> wrote:
Dear Committee,
Simon proposes to simplify the specification of StaticPointers:
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/732
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/blob/wip/spj-static/proposals...
I'd like to nominate Jakob as the shepherd.
Please guide us to a conclusion as outlined in
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/blob/master/README.rst#commit....
If possible, please aim to make a recommendation by 9th December 2025.
Cheers,
Adam
On 25/11/2025 12:18, Simon Peyton Jones wrote:
Adam
I'd like to submit this proposal to the Committee
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/blob/wip/spj-static/ proposals/0000-simplify-static.rst <https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ ghc-proposals/blob/wip/spj-static/proposals/0000-simplify-static.rst>
Thanks
Simon
-- Adam Gundry, Haskell Consultant Well-Typed LLP, https://www.well-typed.com/
Registered in England & Wales, OC335890 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX, England <https://www.google.com/maps/search/27+Old+Gloucester+Street,+London+WC1N+3AX,+England?entry=gmail&source=g> _______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list -- ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org To unsubscribe send an email to ghc-steering-committee-leave@haskell.org
_______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list -- ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org To unsubscribe send an email to ghc-steering-committee-leave@haskell.org