I am not really keen on putting these labels on folks, so my preference
would be to not bake this into the process.
I am also not sure what problem we are solving though.
Iavor
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020, 04:58 Joachim Breitner
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 24.06.2020, 11:57 +0100 schrieb Richard Eisenberg:
A. By having shepherds reach out to community members external to the committee who can share their expert opinion B. By maintaining a list of constituencies that the committee membership covers (ideally)
These can be combined, or we could do neither. (Right now, we do neither.)
I think we have sometimes used A. For example with the proposal about Arrow something, we (or the author?) reached out the likely affected library authors.
I am slightly favoring A (less formal, less process overhead, maybe more flexible).
Cheers, Joachim
-- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
_______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee