Ok, I'll shepherd.
Just to clarify, this is proposed by a user "winterland". I.e. not
Richard, right? In the process document it is the author that "brings it
before the committee" correct?
I checked and it looks like our process document *does not *specify the
means of our committee discussion. I propose we discuss this one right
here on this thread, which we've already got sitting in our inboxes.
Best,
-Ryan
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 2:58 AM, Joachim Breitner
Dear Committee,
this is your secretary speaking:
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/45 was brought before the committee, by our own Richard.
I propose Ryan Newton as the Shepherd, just to rotate this role properly.
Ryan, please reach consensus as described in https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process
I suggest you make a recommendation about the decision, maybe point out debatable points, and assume that anyone who stays quiet agrees with you.
Greetings, Joachim
-- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/