Hello,
I am not very convinced about the utility of this proposal. Also, I think
that the current specification could use more details about how the system
should work. I wrote a comment on the pull-request thread with more
details.
-Iavor
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Joachim Breitner
Hi,
this is your secretary speaking:
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/27 was brought before the committee. I propose Richard as the Shepherd.
Richard, please reach consensus as described in https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process
I suggest you make a recommendation about the decision, maybe point out debatable points, and assume that anyone who stays quiet agrees with you.
Greetings, Joachim
-- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
_______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee