
Dear committee, with all votes in (thanks!), the following extensions made quorum to form GHC2024: DataKinds DerivingStrategies DisambiguateRecordFields ExplicitNamespaces GADTs (and the implied MonoLocalBinds) LambdaCase RoleAnnotations See the full tally in the proposal: https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/blob/joachim/ghc2024/proposal... Any final thoughts? Should we hold off accepting that in light of #628 (I don’t hope so). Cheers, Joachim -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/

Thanks Joachim! I'm (unsurprisingly) happy with the result, and I agree that we should complete the process and go ahead with defining GHC2024 in time for 9.10, even if #628 leads to a bigger shake-up in the future. Cheers, Adam On 05/01/2024 11:00, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Dear committee,
with all votes in (thanks!), the following extensions made quorum to form GHC2024:
DataKinds DerivingStrategies DisambiguateRecordFields ExplicitNamespaces GADTs (and the implied MonoLocalBinds) LambdaCase RoleAnnotations
See the full tally in the proposal: https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/blob/joachim/ghc2024/proposal...
Any final thoughts?
Should we hold off accepting that in light of #628 (I don’t hope so).
Cheers, Joachim
-- Adam Gundry, Haskell Consultant Well-Typed LLP, https://www.well-typed.com/ Registered in England & Wales, OC335890 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX, England

This is such a short list :-/ . At this rate, it'll take about 30 years to
absorb the current mass of extensions GHC. We absolutely need to be more
aggressive there. Either in GHC20XX, or in deprecating extensions. But
we're getting nowhere near getting this hydra under control.
On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 at 12:39, Adam Gundry
Thanks Joachim! I'm (unsurprisingly) happy with the result, and I agree that we should complete the process and go ahead with defining GHC2024 in time for 9.10, even if #628 leads to a bigger shake-up in the future.
Cheers,
Adam
On 05/01/2024 11:00, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Dear committee,
with all votes in (thanks!), the following extensions made quorum to form GHC2024:
DataKinds DerivingStrategies DisambiguateRecordFields ExplicitNamespaces GADTs (and the implied MonoLocalBinds) LambdaCase RoleAnnotations
See the full tally in the proposal:
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/blob/joachim/ghc2024/proposal...
Any final thoughts?
Should we hold off accepting that in light of #628 (I don’t hope so).
Cheers, Joachim
-- Adam Gundry, Haskell Consultant Well-Typed LLP, https://www.well-typed.com/
Registered in England & Wales, OC335890 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX, England
_______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee
-- Arnaud Spiwack Director, Research at https://moduscreate.com and https://tweag.io.

Hi, accepted and merged, and there is a MR against GHC: https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/merge_requests/11882 Cheers, Joachim Am Freitag, dem 05.01.2024 um 11:38 +0000 schrieb Adam Gundry:
Thanks Joachim! I'm (unsurprisingly) happy with the result, and I agree that we should complete the process and go ahead with defining GHC2024 in time for 9.10, even if #628 leads to a bigger shake-up in the future.
Cheers,
Adam
On 05/01/2024 11:00, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Dear committee,
with all votes in (thanks!), the following extensions made quorum to form GHC2024:
DataKinds DerivingStrategies DisambiguateRecordFields ExplicitNamespaces GADTs (and the implied MonoLocalBinds) LambdaCase RoleAnnotations
See the full tally in the proposal: https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/blob/joachim/ghc2024/proposal...
Any final thoughts?
Should we hold off accepting that in light of #628 (I don’t hope so).
Cheers, Joachim
-- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
participants (3)
-
Adam Gundry
-
Arnaud Spiwack
-
Joachim Breitner