I can't tell if SPJ's concerns https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/98#issuecomment-35020681... were addressed by subsequent edits. I'm general in favor of all things that make low-allocation, strict programming more practical. So it is no surprise that this sounds like music to my ears, and thus I'm inclined to argue for "accept". Best, -Ryan On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 3:27 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote:

Dear Committee,

this is your secretary speaking:

Unlifted Newtypes were proposed https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/98

I propose Richard Eisenberg as the Shepherd.

Richard, please reach consensus as described in https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process

I suggest you make a recommendation about the decision, maybe point out debatable points, and assume that anyone who stays quiet agrees with you.

Thanks, Joachim -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/

_______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee