I have no real opinion either way. The meat of the proposal is in the choice of type families. Are they reasonable? Probably. So I'm probably in favour, though I could easily be swayed either way. On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 5:38 PM Alejandro Serrano Mena wrote:

Dear Committee, This proposal adds a kind-level ‘Char’ in a similar way as other built-in types, and an API to work with them and with Symbols. My recommendation is to accept the proposal: it fills a gap in our current kind-level machinery in the most minimal way.

Regards, Alejandro

On 7 Jan 2021 at 12:33:33, Joachim Breitner wrote:

...

Dear Committee,

this is your secretary speaking:

The Char Kind has been proposed by Daniel Rogozin https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/387

https://github.com/serokell/ghc-proposals/blob/master/proposals/0000-char-ki...

I’ll propose Alejandro as the shepherd.

Please guide us to a conclusion as outlined in https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process

Thanks, Joachim -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/

_______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee

_______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee

There are no more concerns left in the GitHub thread, and nobody has raised any concerns. I think this proposal is ready for merge. Alejandro El El jue, 7 ene 2021 a las 18:05, Richard Eisenberg escribió:

I'm in favor of this proposal, for the reasons Alejandro gives: it fills a gap, and it's about as minimal as we can have.

Thanks, Richard

On Jan 7, 2021, at 12:02 PM, Spiwack, Arnaud wrote:

I have no real opinion either way. The meat of the proposal is in the choice of type families. Are they reasonable? Probably. So I'm probably in favour, though I could easily be swayed either way.

On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 5:38 PM Alejandro Serrano Mena wrote:

...

Dear Committee, This proposal adds a kind-level ‘Char’ in a similar way as other built-in types, and an API to work with them and with Symbols. My recommendation is to accept the proposal: it fills a gap in our current kind-level machinery in the most minimal way.

Regards, Alejandro

On 7 Jan 2021 at 12:33:33, Joachim Breitner wrote:

...

Dear Committee,

this is your secretary speaking:

The Char Kind has been proposed by Daniel Rogozin https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/387

https://github.com/serokell/ghc-proposals/blob/master/proposals/0000-char-ki...

I’ll propose Alejandro as the shepherd.

Please guide us to a conclusion as outlined in https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process

Thanks, Joachim -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/

_______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee

_______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee

_______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee