I have no opinion either way. (which, I think, for such a small change counts as a thumb up) On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 4:10 PM Tom Harding wrote:

Hi all,

Richard has proposed a small change to the previously accepted “Whitespace-sensitive operator parsing” proposal (whose current state is rendered here https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/blob/master/proposals/0229-wh...), specifically to say that the described warning be triggered by -Wall and -Wcompat. I think this is sensible and hopefully not particularly controversial, and I recommend that we accept.

The updated proposal may be viewed here https://github.com/goldfirere/ghc-proposals/blob/88690a542ada41dccd0f58d252e...; please reply with any thoughts/concerns!

Thanks, Tom

On 9 Jan 2021, at 16:43, Joachim Breitner wrote:

Dear Committee,

this is your secretary speaking:

Warn on prefix/suffix operators has been proposed by Richard https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/368

This is an amendment to #229 (Whitespace-sensitive operator parsing), see the PR description linked above for details.

I’ll propose Tom as the shepherd.

Please guide us to a conclusion as outlined in https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process

Thanks, Joachim -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/

_______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee

_______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee

Looks sensible to me. Alejandro On 15 Jan 2021 at 16:09:59, Tom Harding wrote:

Hi all,

Richard has proposed a small change to the previously accepted “Whitespace-sensitive operator parsing” proposal (whose current state is rendered here https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/blob/master/proposals/0229-wh...), specifically to say that the described warning be triggered by -Wall and -Wcompat. I think this is sensible and hopefully not particularly controversial, and I recommend that we accept.

The updated proposal may be viewed here https://github.com/goldfirere/ghc-proposals/blob/88690a542ada41dccd0f58d252e...; please reply with any thoughts/concerns!

Thanks, Tom

On 9 Jan 2021, at 16:43, Joachim Breitner wrote:

Dear Committee,

this is your secretary speaking:

Warn on prefix/suffix operators has been proposed by Richard https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/368

This is an amendment to #229 (Whitespace-sensitive operator parsing), see the PR description linked above for details.

I’ll propose Tom as the shepherd.

Please guide us to a conclusion as outlined in https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process

Thanks, Joachim -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/

_______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee

_______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee

Thanks, merged. Am Dienstag, den 02.02.2021, 10:24 +0000 schrieb Tom Harding:

Hi Joachim,

After two weeks and no thumbs down, I think we should mark this one as accepted!

Thanks, Tom

...

On 18 Jan 2021, at 21:03, Alejandro Serrano Mena wrote:

Looks sensible to me.

Alejandro

On 15 Jan 2021 at 16:09:59, Tom Harding wrote:

...

Hi all,

Richard has proposed a small change to the previously accepted “Whitespace-sensitive operator parsing” proposal (whose current state is rendered here), specifically to say that the described warning be triggered by -Wall and -Wcompat. I think this is sensible and hopefully not particularly controversial, and I recommend that we accept.

The updated proposal may be viewed here; please reply with any thoughts/concerns!

Thanks, Tom

...

On 9 Jan 2021, at 16:43, Joachim Breitner wrote:

Dear Committee,

this is your secretary speaking:

Warn on prefix/suffix operators has been proposed by Richard https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/368

This is an amendment to #229 (Whitespace-sensitive operator parsing), see the PR description linked above for details.

I’ll propose Tom as the shepherd.

Please guide us to a conclusion as outlined in https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process

Thanks, Joachim -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/

_______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee

_______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee

_______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/