
Dear Committee, this is your secretary speaking: https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/45 was brought before the committee, by our own Richard. I propose Ryan Newton as the Shepherd, just to rotate this role properly. Ryan, please reach consensus as described in https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process I suggest you make a recommendation about the decision, maybe point out debatable points, and assume that anyone who stays quiet agrees with you. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/

Ok, I'll shepherd.
Just to clarify, this is proposed by a user "winterland". I.e. not
Richard, right? In the process document it is the author that "brings it
before the committee" correct?
I checked and it looks like our process document *does not *specify the
means of our committee discussion. I propose we discuss this one right
here on this thread, which we've already got sitting in our inboxes.
Best,
-Ryan
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 2:58 AM, Joachim Breitner
Dear Committee,
this is your secretary speaking:
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/45 was brought before the committee, by our own Richard.
I propose Ryan Newton as the Shepherd, just to rotate this role properly.
Ryan, please reach consensus as described in https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process
I suggest you make a recommendation about the decision, maybe point out debatable points, and assume that anyone who stays quiet agrees with you.
Greetings, Joachim
-- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/

Hi, it is by Richard, I just got the URL wrong. The right pull request is https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/35 sorry for that. Using this thread is fine. Joachim Am Dienstag, den 11.07.2017, 10:58 -0400 schrieb Ryan Newton:
Just to clarify, this is proposed by a user "winterland". I.e. not Richard, right? In the process document it is the author that "brings it before the committee" correct?
I checked and it looks like our process document does not specify the means of our committee discussion. I propose we discuss this one right here on this thread, which we've already got sitting in our inboxes.
Best, -Ryan
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 2:58 AM, Joachim Breitner
wrote: Dear Committee,
this is your secretary speaking:
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/45 was brought before the committee, by our own Richard.
I propose Ryan Newton as the Shepherd, just to rotate this role properly.
Ryan, please reach consensus as described in https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process
I suggest you make a recommendation about the decision, maybe point out debatable points, and assume that anyone who stays quiet agrees with you.
Greetings, Joachim
-- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
-- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de • https://www.joachim-breitner.de/ XMPP: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de • OpenPGP-Key: 0xF0FBF51F Debian Developer: nomeata@debian.org
participants (2)
-
Joachim Breitner
-
Ryan Newton