April 2014 - ghc-tickets

[GHC] #8178: Need TypeRep for Symbol and numeric type literals; and Typeable instances
by GHC 08 Aug '15

08 Aug '15

#8178: Need TypeRep for Symbol and numeric type literals; and Typeable instances ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: simonpj | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.6.3 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Type of failure: None/Unknown Difficulty: Unknown | Test Case: Blocked By: | Blocking: Related Tickets: | ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Nicolas Trangez points out that we don't have a `TypeRep` for types involving literal strings or numerics. E.g. what is `(typeRep (undefined :: Proxy "foo"))`? Here is Nicolas's example: {{{ {-# LANGUAGE DataKinds, KindSignatures, DeriveFunctor, DeriveDataTypeable #-} module Main where import Data.Typeable import GHC.TypeLits data NoSymbol n a b = NoSymbol a b deriving (Typeable) data WithSymbol (n :: Symbol) a b = WithSymbol a b deriving (Typeable) data Sym deriving (Typeable) main :: IO () main = do print $ typeOf (undefined :: NoSymbol Sym Int Int) let d = undefined :: WithSymbol "sym" Int Int {- print $ typeOf d No instance for (Typeable Symbol "sym") arising from a use of ‛typeOf’ -} return () }}} Just as types contain literal strings and natural numbers, so too must `TypeRep`, in some way. Once we have a suitable `TypeRep` we can make built-in instance for `Typeable` that return the appropriate representation. At the moment we have (in `Data.Typeable.Internals`): {{{ data TypeRep = TypeRep {-# UNPACK #-} !Fingerprint TyCon [TypeRep] data TyCon = TyCon { tyConHash :: {-# UNPACK #-} !Fingerprint, tyConPackage :: String, tyConModule :: String, tyConName :: String } }}} with instances for Eq and Ord. Perhaps we need {{{ data TypeRep = TcApp {-# UNPACK #-} !Fingerprint TyCon [TypeRep] | TcSym String | TcNat Integer }}} or something like that? I'm not certain. I think Iavor is going to think about it. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8178> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 2

[GHC] #8488: Annotations should not distinguish type and value
by GHC 31 Jul '15

31 Jul '15

#8488: Annotations should not distinguish type and value ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: simonpj | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.6.3 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Type of failure: None/Unknown Difficulty: Unknown | Test Case: Blocked By: | Blocking: Related Tickets: | ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- In `HsDecls` we have {{{ data AnnDecl name = HsAnnotation (AnnProvenance name) (Located (HsExpr name)) data AnnProvenance name = ValueAnnProvenance name | TypeAnnProvenance name | ModuleAnnProvenance }}} And there's now a similar 3-way distinction in Template Haskell `Syntax`: {{{ data AnnTarget = ModuleAnnotation | TypeAnnotation Name | ValueAnnotation Name }}} But there's really no need to distinguish between `TypeAnnProvenance` and `ValueAnnProvenance` (and similarly in the TH vesrion) because the namespace on the `Name` makes that distinction. So the current story is redundant, and hence has silly case where you have a `ValueAnnProvenance` on a type constructor. Better to collapse the two. I'm making this a ticket so that people can comment. I hope that Gergely may be able to do it as part of his TH/annotation work. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8488> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 5

[GHC] #8387: View patterns + pattern bindings: finnicky about scoping
by GHC 31 Jul '15

31 Jul '15

#8387: View patterns + pattern bindings: finnicky about scoping ----------------------------+---------------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: tinctorius | Status: new Type: bug | Milestone: Priority: normal | Version: 7.6.3 Component: Compiler | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Keywords: | Type of failure: GHC rejects valid program Architecture: | Test Case: Unknown/Multiple | Blocking: Difficulty: Unknown | Blocked By: | Related Tickets: | ----------------------------+---------------------------------------------- Assume `{-# LANGUAGE ViewPatterns #-}`. This works: {{{ (id -> ()) = () }}} This also works: {{{ di :: a -> a di = \x -> x where (di -> ()) = () }}} But none of the following work: {{{ (di -> ()) = () -- Not in scope: di di :: a -> a di = \x -> x }}} {{{ di :: a -> a di = \x -> x (di -> ()) = () -- Not in scope: di }}} {{{ (di -> ()) = () -- Not in scope: di where di :: a -> a di = \x -> x }}} This looks like a bug to me. Is it? And is this in any way related to #4061? -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8387> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 4

[GHC] #8253: example "Core syntax" is ancient
by GHC 31 Jul '15

31 Jul '15

#8253: example "Core syntax" is ancient -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: rwbarton | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Documentation | Version: 7.6.3 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Type of failure: Documentation Difficulty: Easy (less than 1 | bug hour) | Test Case: Blocked By: | Blocking: Related Tickets: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- [http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/7.6.3/html/users_guide/options- debugging.html#idp39365504 User's guide section 4.19.5] has some funky "Core syntax" that (according to git blame) dates back to at least 2000, and probably longer ago than that. It could use an update. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8253> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 3

[GHC] #8151: ghc-7.4.2 on OpenIndiana (Solaris) createSubprocess fails
by GHC 31 Jul '15

31 Jul '15

#8151: ghc-7.4.2 on OpenIndiana (Solaris) createSubprocess fails ----------------------------+-------------------------------------------- Reporter: troydm | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.4.2 Keywords: | Operating System: Solaris Architecture: x86 | Type of failure: Runtime performance bug Difficulty: Unknown | Test Case: Blocked By: | Blocking: Related Tickets: | ----------------------------+-------------------------------------------- when i'm compiling this test.hs with ghc -thread ./test.hs and then execute it i get Starting Subprocess Exit code: ExitFailure 127 This error code indicates that command isn't found (i have ghc in /usr/local/bin) and it's specified in PATH variable, however it acts as if it's not even there however if i remove -threaded flag and recompile code again, it works Starting Subprocess ghc: no input files Usage: For basic information, try the `--help' option. Exit code: ExitFailure 1 -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8151> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 7

[GHC] #8767: Add rules involving `coerce` to the libraries
by GHC 28 Jul '15

28 Jul '15

#8767: Add rules involving `coerce` to the libraries ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: nomeata | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: libraries/base | Version: 7.9 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Type of failure: None/Unknown Difficulty: Unknown | Test Case: Blocked By: 8718 | Blocking: Related Tickets: #2110 | ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- With #2110 fixed, we can now add rules like {{{ {-# RULES "map/coerce" [0] map coerce = coerce #-} }}} to the standard libraries. But probably this should happen together or after #8718. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8767> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 27

[GHC] #8538: confusing specialization CORE warning, also can't mark type class instances INLINEABLE unless class defn is marked INLINEABLE
by GHC 27 Jul '15

27 Jul '15

#8538: confusing specialization CORE warning, also can't mark type class instances INLINEABLE unless class defn is marked INLINEABLE ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: carter | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.6.3 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Type of failure: None/Unknown Difficulty: Unknown | Test Case: Blocked By: | Blocking: Related Tickets: | ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- As part of writing an array library for numerical purposes, I have a static sized strict list type for representing the Indexing tuple. One implementation strategy makes it a tad generic, and then I'm writing a bunch of manipulation utilities using Functor, Applicative and Foldable. I wrote it with all the functions marked INLINABLE so i could ensure that I could have the index arith calculations SPECIALIZE in the common cases. Unfortunately, it seems like type class instances can only marked INLINABLE if the type class definition is itself marked INLINE or INLINABLE. Considering i'm writing a numerical array library, I want to make sure that address arithmetic. This could could be argued to be by design (and thus a wont fix). That aside, I also get the following Warning for my "map2" function, which i found surprising. (and it perhaps is worth some investigation / cleanup ) {{{ src/Numerical/Types/Shape.hs:165:1: Warning: RULE left-hand side too complicated to desugar let { $dFunctor :: Functor (Shape ('S N0)) [LclId] $dFunctor = Numerical.Types.Shape.$fFunctorShape @ 'Z $dFunctor } in map2 @ a @ b @ c @ N2 (Numerical.Types.Shape.$fApplicativeShape @ ('S N0) (Numerical.Types.Shape.$fFunctorShape @ ('S N0) $dFunctor) (Numerical.Types.Shape.$fApplicativeShape @ 'Z $dFunctor Numerical.Types.Shape.$fApplicativeShape0)) }}} {{{ {-# LANGUAGE PolyKinds #-} {-# LANGUAGE BangPatterns #-} {-# LANGUAGE DataKinds #-} {-# LANGUAGE TypeFamilies #-} {-# LANGUAGE GADTs #-} {-# LANGUAGE DeriveDataTypeable #-} {-# LANGUAGE TypeOperators #-} {-# LANGUAGE FlexibleInstances #-} {-# LANGUAGE FlexibleContexts #-} {-# LANGUAGE FunctionalDependencies #-} {-# LANGUAGE UndecidableInstances #-} {-# LANGUAGE ScopedTypeVariables #-} {-# LANGUAGE StandaloneDeriving #-} {-# LANGUAGE CPP #-} {-# LANGUAGE TemplateHaskell #-} {-# LANGUAGE NoImplicitPrelude #-} module Numerical.Types.Shape where import GHC.Magic import Data.Monoid import Data.Functor import Data.Foldable import Control.Applicative -- import Numerical.Types.Nat import Prelude (seq, ($!),($),Show(..),Eq(),Int) data Nat = S !Nat | Z type N0 = Z type N1= S N0 type N2 = S N1 type N3 = S N2 type N4 = S N3 {- not doing the HLIST style shape because I don't want to have any pattern matchings going on. Also would play hell with locality quality in the address translation hackery, because there'd be an extra load to get those ints! -} infixr 3 :* {- the concern basically boils down to "will it specialize / inline well" -} data Shape (rank :: Nat) a where Nil :: Shape Z a (:*) :: !(a) -> !(Shape r a ) -> Shape (S r) a --deriving instance (Show (Shape rank a)) -- deriving instance Eq (Shape rank a) -- #if defined( __GLASGOW_HASKELL__ ) && ( __GLASGOW_HASKELL__ >= 707) --deriving instance Typeable (Shape rank a) -- #endif instance Functor (Shape Z) where fmap = \ f Nil -> Nil {-# INLINABLE fmap #-} {-# SPECIALIZE fmap :: (a ->b )-> (Shape Z a)-> (Shape Z b) #-} instance (Functor (Shape r)) => Functor (Shape (S r)) where fmap = \ f (a :* rest) -> f a :* fmap f rest {-# INLINABLE fmap #-} {-# SPECIALIZE fmap :: (a ->b )-> (Shape N1 a)-> (Shape N1 b) #-} {-# SPECIALIZE fmap :: (a ->b )-> (Shape N2 a)-> (Shape N2 b) #-} instance Applicative (Shape Z) where pure = \ _ -> Nil {-# INLINE pure #-} (<*>) = \ _ _ -> Nil {-# INLINE (<*>) #-} {-# SPECIALIZE pure :: a -> Shape Z a #-} {-# SPECIALIZE (<*>) :: Shape Z (a -> b) -> Shape Z a -> Shape Z b #-} instance Applicative (Shape r)=> Applicative (Shape (S r)) where pure = \ a -> a :* (pure a) {-# INLINE pure #-} (<*>) = \ (f:* fs) (a :* as) -> f a :* (inline (<*>)) fs as {-# INLINE (<*>) #-} {-# SPECIALIZE pure :: a -> (Shape Z a) #-} {-# SPECIALIZE pure :: a -> (Shape N1 a) #-} {-# SPECIALIZE pure :: a -> (Shape N2 a )#-} instance Foldable (Shape Z) where foldMap = \ _ _ -> mempty {-# INLINE foldMap #-} foldl = \ _ init _ -> init {-# INLINE foldl #-} foldr = \ _ init _ -> init {-# INLINE foldr #-} foldr' = \_ !init _ -> init {-# INLINE foldr' #-} foldl' = \_ !init _ -> init {-# INLINE foldl' #-} -- {-# SPECIALIZE foldMap :: Monoid m => (a -> m)-> Shape Z a -> m #-} -- {-# SPECIALIZE foldl :: (a ->b -> a) -> a -> Shape Z b -> a #-} -- {-# SPECIALIZE foldr :: (b ->a -> a) -> a -> Shape Z b -> a #-} -- {-# SPECIALIZE foldl' :: (a ->b -> a) -> a -> Shape Z b -> a #-} -- {-# SPECIALIZE foldr' :: (b ->a -> a) -> a -> Shape Z b -> a #-} instance (Foldable (Shape r)) => Foldable (Shape (S r)) where foldMap = \f (a:* as) -> f a <> foldMap f as {-# INLINE foldMap #-} foldl' = \f !init (a :* as) -> let next = f init a in next `seq` (inline foldl) f next as {-# INLINE foldl' #-} foldr' = \f !init (a :* as ) -> f a $! (inline foldr) f init as {-# INLINABLE foldr' #-} foldl = \f init (a :* as) -> let next = f init a in (inline foldl) f next as {-# INLINE foldl #-} foldr = \f init (a :* as ) -> f a $ (inline foldr) f init as {-# INLINE foldr #-} {-# SPECIALIZE foldMap::Monoid m => (a -> m)-> Shape N1 a -> m #-} {-# SPECIALIZE foldl :: (a ->b -> a) ->a -> Shape N1 b -> a #-} {-# SPECIALIZE foldr :: (b ->a -> a) -> a -> Shape N1 b -> a #-} {-# SPECIALIZE foldl' :: (a ->b -> a) -> a -> Shape N1 b -> a #-} {-# SPECIALIZE foldr' :: (b ->a -> a) -> a -> Shape N1 b -> a #-} {-# SPECIALIZE foldMap :: Monoid m => (a -> m)-> Shape N2 a -> m #-} {-# SPECIALIZE foldl :: (a ->b-> a) ->a -> Shape N2 b -> a #-} {-# SPECIALIZE foldr :: (b ->a -> a) -> a -> Shape N2 b -> a #-} {-# SPECIALIZE foldl' :: (a ->b -> a) -> a -> Shape N2 b -> a #-} {-# SPECIALIZE foldr' :: (b ->a -> a) -> a -> Shape N2 b -> a #-} -- map2 :: (Applicative (Shape r))=> (a->b ->c) -> (Shape r a) -> (Shape r b) -> (Shape r c ) map2 = \f l r -> pure f <*> l <*> r {-# INLINABLE map2 #-} {-# SPECIALIZE map2 :: (a -> b -> c ) -> (Shape Z a) -> (Shape Z b) -> (Shape Z c )#-} {-# SPECIALIZE map2 :: (a -> b -> c ) -> (Shape N1 a) -> (Shape N1 b) -> (Shape N1 c )#-} {-# SPECIALIZE map2 :: (a -> b -> c ) -> (Shape N2 a) -> (Shape N2 b) -> (Shape N2 c )#-} }}} -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8538> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 2

[GHC] #8327: Cmm sinking does not eliminate dead code in loops
by GHC 25 Jul '15

25 Jul '15

#8327: Cmm sinking does not eliminate dead code in loops ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: jstolarek | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.7 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Type of failure: None/Unknown Difficulty: Unknown | Test Case: Blocked By: | Blocking: Related Tickets: | ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Cmm code shown in #8326 is suboptimal. For this Haskell code: {{{ isTrue# :: Int# -> Bool isTrue# 1# = True isTrue# _ = False f :: Int# -> Int f x | isTrue# (x ># 0#) = I# x | otherwise = -(I# x) }}} we get Cmm that contains dead code in a loop: {{{ cFg: // False branch Hp = Hp + 16; if (Hp > HpLim) goto cFy; else goto cFx; cFy: // not enough heap, call GC HpAlloc = 16; I64[Sp - 16] = cFf; R1 = _sEV::I64; I64[Sp - 8] = _sEU::I64; Sp = Sp - 16; call stg_gc_unbx_r1(R1) returns to cFf, args: 8, res: 8, upd: 8; cFf: // re-do the False branch _sEU::I64 = I64[Sp + 8]; Sp = Sp + 16; _sEV::I64 = R1; goto cFg; cFx: // RHS of False branch I64[Hp - 8] = GHC.Types.I#_con_info; I64[Hp] = -_sEU::I64; R1 = Hp - 7; call (P64[Sp])(R1) args: 8, res: 0, upd: 8; }}} Notice that `_sEV` is dead - we should optimize it away. This is a known deficiency in the Cmm sinking pass (i.e. it does not work for loops). I'm putting this on Trac so we have this documented. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8327> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 2

[GHC] #8604: Some stack/vmem limits (ulimit) combinations causing GHC to fail
by GHC 24 Jul '15

24 Jul '15

#8604: Some stack/vmem limits (ulimit) combinations causing GHC to fail ----------------------------------+---------------------------------- Reporter: clavin | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.6.3 Keywords: | Operating System: Other Architecture: x86_64 (amd64) | Type of failure: Runtime crash Difficulty: Unknown | Test Case: Blocked By: | Blocking: Related Tickets: | ----------------------------------+---------------------------------- I have encountered a strange occurrence with GHC that was causing several GHC job failures on an SGE cluster. It turned out that there were other SGE users who needed an absurdly large stack size limit (set via 'ulimit -s') in the several gigabytes range. The default stack size limit had to be raised for the entire cluster. Any job that was run on a machine where the virtual memory limit was less than or equal to 2X the stack size limit, GHC would crash with the following message: ghc: failed to create OS thread: Cannot allocate memory I am running on GHC 7.6.3 with a 64-bit RedHat Enterprise OS, version 5.5. To reproduce the error, I was able to create the following test case: [ ~]$ ulimit -v unlimited [ ~]$ ulimit -s 10240 [ ~]$ ghc --version The Glorious Glasgow Haskell Compilation System, version 7.6.3 [ ~]$ ulimit -v 200000 [ ~]$ ulimit -s 100000 [ ~]$ ghc --version ghc: failed to create OS thread: Cannot allocate memory Several other programs work find using these settings, but GHC consistently has problems. Is this a fundamental issue with how GHC operates or can this be addressed? -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8604> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 7

[GHC] #8131: T7571 with WAY=llvm fails, but not WAY=optllvm
by GHC 19 Jul '15

19 Jul '15

#8131: T7571 with WAY=llvm fails, but not WAY=optllvm ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: thoughtpolice | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: high | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.7 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Type of failure: None/Unknown Difficulty: Unknown | Test Case: Blocked By: | Blocking: Related Tickets: | ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Test case (#7571 just will not die, it seems) {{{ $ make TEST=T7571 WAY=llvm ... ====> Scanning ./all.T =====> T7571(llvm) 6 of 7 [0, 0, 0] cd . && '/home/a/ghc/ghc-pristine/inplace/bin/ghc-stage2' -fforce-recomp -dcore-lint -dcmm-lint -dno-debug-output -no-user-package-db -rtsopts -fno-ghci-history -c T7571.cmm -fllvm -no-hs-main >T7571.comp.stderr 2>&1 Actual stderr output differs from expected: --- /dev/null 2013-08-07 22:18:14.132934017 -0500 +++ ./T7571.comp.stderr 2013-08-14 01:26:33.942103723 -0500 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +WARNING: Non constant alignment value given for memcpy! Please report to GHC developers *** unexpected failure for T7571(llvm) }}} However, this test case does not fail under WAY=optllvm, which I think is worth investigating probably: {{{ $ make TEST=T7571 WAY=optllvm ... ====> Scanning ./all.T =====> T7571(optllvm) 6 of 7 [0, 0, 0] cd . && '/home/a/ghc/ghc-pristine/inplace/bin/ghc-stage2' -fforce-recomp -dcore-lint -dcmm-lint -dno-debug-output -no-user-package-db -rtsopts -fno-ghci-history -c T7571.cmm -O -fllvm -no-hs-main >T7571.comp.stderr 2>&1 OVERALL SUMMARY for test run started at Wed Aug 14 01:25:42 CDT 2013 7 total tests, which gave rise to 28 test cases, of which 27 were skipped 0 had missing libraries 1 expected passes 0 expected failures 0 caused framework failures 0 unexpected passes 0 unexpected failures }}} However, there is another way to trigger this bug in *both* cases: {{{ #include "Cmm.h" testMemcpy (W_ dst, W_ src, W_ l, W_ sz) { prim %memcpy(dst, src, l, sz); return (); } }}} will fail both ways. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8131> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 17