August 2014 - ghc-tickets

[GHC] #9522: SPECIALISE pragmas for derived instances
by GHC 01 Aug '17

01 Aug '17

#9522: SPECIALISE pragmas for derived instances -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: simonpj | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.8.2 Keywords: | Operating System: Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Unknown/Multiple Difficulty: Unknown | Type of failure: Blocked By: | None/Unknown Related Tickets: | Test Case: | Blocking: | Differential Revisions: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- In package `ghc-prim`, in `GHC.Classes` we have {{{ instance (Eq a) => Eq [a] where {-# SPECIALISE instance Eq [[Char]] #-} {-# SPECIALISE instance Eq [Char] #-} {-# SPECIALISE instance Eq [Int] #-} [] == [] = True (x:xs) == (y:ys) = x == y && xs == ys _xs == _ys = False }}} The `SPECIALISE instance` pragmas instantiate the code for these commonly- used types. But for tuples we use `deriving`: {{{ deriving instance (Eq a, Eq b) => Eq (a, b) }}} and many more similar. There is no way to add a `SPECIALISE instance` pragma for a derived instance. This is bad, because they are heavily used. It should probably be possible to have a top-level {{{ {-# SPECIALISE instance Eq (Int, Bool) #-} }}} even in another module (as we can now do for functions. To do this right, we'd need to make the code for derived methods `INLINEALBE`. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9522> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 4

[GHC] #8827: Inferring Safe mode with GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving is wrong
by GHC 01 Aug '17

01 Aug '17

#8827: Inferring Safe mode with GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving is wrong ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: goldfire | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: 7.8.1 Component: Compiler | Version: 7.8.1-rc1 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Type of failure: None/Unknown Difficulty: Unknown | Test Case: Blocked By: | Blocking: Related Tickets: | ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Consider the following modules: {{{ module A (List, ints) where data List a = Nil | Cons a (List a) infixr 4 `Cons` ints :: List Int ints = 1 `Cons` 2 `Cons` 3 `Cons` Nil }}} {{{ {-# LANGUAGE GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving #-} module B where import A newtype Age = MkAge Int deriving C class C a where cList :: List a instance C Int where cList = ints }}} {{{ {-# LANGUAGE Safe #-} module C (ages) where import A import B ages :: List Age ages = cList }}} Module C compiles without a hiccup. But, it shouldn't: the coercion between `ages` and `ints` (performed by !GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving in module B) isn't Safe, as it breaks through `List`'s abstraction. (Note that the constructors of `List` are ''not'' exported from module A!) If module B includes `{-# LANGUAGE Safe #-}`, it duly doesn't compile, because of the stringent "constructors-must-be-in-scope" check done by the `Coercible` mechanism. The problem is that safety can be ''inferred'' without this check taking place. You may also want to read the commentary on #8745 for related discussion. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8827> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 52

[GHC] #8631: Need ImpredicativeTypes for GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving?
by GHC 01 Aug '17

01 Aug '17

#8631: Need ImpredicativeTypes for GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving? ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: goldfire | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.7 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Type of failure: None/Unknown Difficulty: Unknown | Test Case: Blocked By: | Blocking: Related Tickets: | ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Nathan Howell posts this code: {{{ {-# LANGUAGE FlexibleInstances #-} {-# LANGUAGE GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving #-} {-# LANGUAGE MultiParamTypeClasses #-} {-# LANGUAGE RankNTypes #-} -- Uncomment to compile on GHC 7.8 -- {-# LANGUAGE ImpredicativeTypes #-} module Repro where import Control.Monad.Trans.Cont import Control.Monad.Trans.State.Lazy newtype AnyContT m a = AnyContT { unAnyContT :: forall r . ContT r m a } class MonadAnyCont b m where anyContToM :: (forall r . (a -> b r) -> b r) -> m a instance MonadAnyCont b (AnyContT m) where anyContToM _ = error "foo" data DecodeState = DecodeState newtype DecodeAST a = DecodeAST { unDecodeAST :: AnyContT (StateT DecodeState IO) a } deriving (MonadAnyCont IO) }}} Compiling on HEAD produces {{{ [1 of 1] Compiling Repro ( repro.hs, interpreted ) repro.hs:24:13: Cannot instantiate unification variable ‛b0’ with a type involving foralls: (forall r. (a1 -> IO r) -> IO r) -> DecodeAST a1 Perhaps you want ImpredicativeTypes In the expression: GHC.Prim.coerce (anyContToM :: (forall (r :: *). (a -> IO r) -> IO r) -> AnyContT (StateT DecodeState IO) a) :: forall (a :: *). (forall (r :: *). (a -> IO r) -> IO r) -> DecodeAST a In an equation for ‛anyContToM’: anyContToM = GHC.Prim.coerce (anyContToM :: (forall (r :: *). (a -> IO r) -> IO r) -> AnyContT (StateT DecodeState IO) a) :: forall (a :: *). (forall (r :: *). (a -> IO r) -> IO r) -> DecodeAST a Failed, modules loaded: none. }}} Two questions: 1. Should we require users to specify !ImpredicativeTypes here? Or, should the !GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving mechanism (which sometimes is impredicative) just assume the extension? 2. Can we improve the error message? I'd like to note that the original example really ''does'' require impredicativity -- the question is whether and how to bother the user with this technicality. Small program note: I've done a lot of stuff with !GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving lately but am on holiday until Jan. 6, so don't expect responses! -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8631> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 17

[GHC] #9444: -ddump-deriv doesn't dump failed newtype-deriving
by GHC 01 Aug '17

01 Aug '17

#9444: -ddump-deriv doesn't dump failed newtype-deriving -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: goldfire | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.8.2 Keywords: | Operating System: Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Unknown/Multiple Difficulty: Unknown | Type of failure: Blocked By: | None/Unknown Related Tickets: | Test Case: | Blocking: | Differential Revisions: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- When I say {{{#!hs {-# LANGUAGE GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving, TypeFamilies #-} {-# OPTIONS_GHC -ddump-deriv #-} type family F a type instance F Int = Bool class C a where meth :: a -> F a instance C Int where meth = (> 0) newtype Age = MkAge Int deriving C }}} I get an error (which I should), but I don't get the derived `C` instance, as requested by `-ddump-deriv`. The output should include this helpful information. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9444> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 3

[GHC] #9020: Massive blowup of code size on trivial program
by GHC 31 Jul '17

31 Jul '17

#9020: Massive blowup of code size on trivial program ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: simonpj | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.8.2 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Type of failure: None/Unknown Difficulty: Unknown | Test Case: Blocked By: | Blocking: Related Tickets: | ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- The test `simplCore/should_compile/simpl015` was leading to massive compile times. This is weird: it looks like: {{{ main = do { return () ; return () ... hundreds more times ... ; return () } }}} It turns out that the cause was over-eager eta-expansion. Each `return ()` gives a top-level PAP thus {{{ lvl17 :: IO () lvl17 = returnIO () }}} But these definitions are then eta-expanded, thus: {{{ lvl17 = ((\eta. returnIO () |> sym g) eta) |> g where g :: State# RealWorld -> (# State# RealWorld, () #) ~ IO () }}} Now in general it makes sense to eta-expand through newtypes (as is done here), because it exposes more lambadas. But it really doesn't make sense to eta-expand a PAP like this. Fortunately the fix is easy: use `exprArity` rather than `manifestArity` in `SimplUtils.tryEtaExpandRhs`. The effect on `simpl015` is dramatic: compiler allocation drops from 6.6G to 812M; and residency drops from 1.8G to 45M. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9020> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 13

[GHC] #9453: The example for GHC Generics is kinda broken
by GHC 24 Jul '17

24 Jul '17

#9453: The example for GHC Generics is kinda broken -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: Feuerbach | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Documentation | Version: 7.8.2 Keywords: | Operating System: Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Unknown/Multiple Difficulty: Unknown | Type of failure: Blocked By: | None/Unknown Related Tickets: | Test Case: | Blocking: | Differential Revisions: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- From http://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/2douzn/problem_with_popular_ghcgen…: The popular GHC.Generics serialization example at http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/generic- programming.html#idp25226064 illustrates how to serialize a sum datatype (a :+: b), with a 0 bit representing a and a 1 bit representing b. However, consider a :+: b :+: c. If the compiler treats this as (a :+: b) :+: c, then a is 00, b is 01, c is 1. If it's a :+: (b :+: c), then a is 0, b is 10, c is 11. The compiler's decision, even though (as I understand it) consistent for any given compile, could differ later. The manual, at http://hackage.haskell.org/package/generic- deriving-1.6.3/docs/Generics-Deriving-Base.html#g:9 states not to depend on the ordering, which the example does. I think this is a valid concern, and the manual should be at least updated to discuss this problem. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9453> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 7

[GHC] #8903: Add dead store elimination
by GHC 18 Jul '17

18 Jul '17

#8903: Add dead store elimination ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: tibbe | Owner: Type: feature request | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.9 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Type of failure: None/Unknown Difficulty: Unknown | Test Case: Blocked By: | Blocking: Related Tickets: | ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- We could use some dead store elimination in the code generator. Here's some Cmm that has redundant stores to the same locations: {{{ // thawArray#: I64[Hp - 168] = I64[PicBaseReg + stg_MUT_ARR_PTRS_DIRTY_info@GOTPCREL]; I64[Hp - 160] = 16; I64[Hp - 152] = 17; _c2nT::I64 = Hp - 168; call MO_Memcpy(_c2nT::I64 + 24, _s2cx::P64 + 24, 128, 8); // writeArray#: P64[(_c2nT::I64 + 24) + (_s2cy::I64 << 3)] = _s2cE::P64; I64[_c2nT::I64] = I64[PicBaseReg + stg_MUT_ARR_PTRS_DIRTY_info@GOTPCREL]; I8[(_c2nT::I64 + 24) + ((I64[_c2nT::I64 + 8] << 3) + (_s2cy::I64 >> 7))] = 1 :: W8; // unsafeFreeze# I64[_c2nT::I64] = I64[PicBaseReg + stg_MUT_ARR_PTRS_FROZEN0_info@GOTPCREL]; }}} There are three stores to the same location (`I64[_c2nT::I64]`). (There's also one much less obvious double store to another location, which will probably be much harder to address: the store to `P64[(_c2nT::I64 + 24) + (_s2cy::I64 << 3)]` overwrites a word previous written by the `MO_Memcpy`. Getting to that one will be hard as the memcoy callish !MachOp only gets expanded in the backend.) -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8903> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 4

[GHC] #8346: Rank 1 type signature still requires RankNTypes
by GHC 11 Jul '17

11 Jul '17

#8346: Rank 1 type signature still requires RankNTypes ----------------------------+---------------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: tinctorius | Status: new Type: bug | Milestone: Priority: normal | Version: 7.6.3 Component: Compiler | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Keywords: | Type of failure: GHC rejects valid program Architecture: | Test Case: Unknown/Multiple | Blocking: Difficulty: Unknown | Blocked By: | Related Tickets: #2605 | ----------------------------+---------------------------------------------- When trying to figure out which type variable names are *actually* bound in `ScopedTypeVariables`, I tried floating `forall`s into the covariant argument of the function type. Essentially, I ran into the problem that programs like the following are rejected: {{{ #!hs {-# LANGUAGE ExplicitForAll #-} tuple :: forall a. a -> (forall b. b -> (a, b)) tuple = (,) }}} The message is as follows: {{{ Main.hs:2:10: Illegal polymorphic or qualified type: forall b. b -> (a, b) Perhaps you intended to use -XRankNTypes or -XRank2Types In the type signature for `tuple': tuple :: forall a. a -> (forall b. b -> (a, b)) }}} As far as I know, the rank of a type is defined by how deep quantifiers are nested in contravariant parts of that type. Or something like that. Also, as far as I know, `forall a. a -> (forall b. b -> (a, b))` is equivalent to `forall a b. a -> b -> (a, b)`, and more importantly, both are rank-1 polymorphic. There should be no need to use extensions that allow higher-ranked polymorphism. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8346> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 4

[GHC] #8697: Type rationals
by GHC 16 Jun '17

16 Jun '17

#8697: Type rationals ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: MikeIzbicki | Owner: Type: feature request | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler | Version: 7.6.3 Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Type of failure: None/Unknown Difficulty: Unknown | Test Case: Blocked By: | Blocking: Related Tickets: | ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- I've used GHC's Type Nats to implement my own type level rationals (code below). This works fine, but the syntax is a little funky because you have to write out the number as a fraction. For example, you must write 13/10 instead of 1.3; or even worse, 13/1 instead of 13. It would be nice to just write the decimal notation. I only see one potential problem with this feature: the dot in the decimal notation could interfere with the dot in forall statements. I guess this can be parsed unambiguously, but maybe not. {{{ data Frac = Frac Nat Nat data instance Sing (n::Frac) = SFrac Integer Integer instance (SingI a, SingI b) => SingI ('Frac a b) where sing = SFrac (fromSing (sing :: Sing a)) (fromSing (sing :: Sing b)) instance Fractional r => SingE (Kind :: Frac) r where fromSing (SFrac a b) = fromIntegral a/fromIntegral b type (/) a b = 'Frac a b }}} -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8697> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 14

[GHC] #8703: Use guard pages rather than heap checks
by GHC 07 Jun '17

07 Jun '17

#8703: Use guard pages rather than heap checks ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: schyler | Owner: simonmar Type: feature request | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Runtime System | Version: Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Type of failure: None/Unknown Difficulty: Unknown | Test Case: Blocked By: | Blocking: Related Tickets: | ------------------------------------+------------------------------------- By mmap'ing memory using MAP_ANONYMOUS (or /dev/zero) as PROT_NONE (Windows has an equivalent functionality with VirtualAlloc), it's possible to create a page that will fault when read or written to. It may be possible to remove the heap checks in the runtime, speeding up allocations, and instead expand the heap when a fault is raised. This is likely cheaper for large pages full of many small allocations than the cost of the heap checking branch. -- Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8703> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler

1 8