21 Jan
2015
21 Jan
'15
4:46 a.m.
Wrongly, as it turned out. Sorry! The problem remains. On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 2:37 PM, David Feuer <david.feuer@gmail.com> wrote:
And I've closed it as worksforme. I couldn't reproduce the problem with 7.11.20150103.
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:42 AM, adam vogt <vogt.adam@gmail.com> wrote:
I've added it as https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10009
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Richard Eisenberg <eir@cis.upenn.edu> wrote:
After quite a bit of thought, I agree that this is a regression and that the original program should be accepted.
Make a bug report!
Thanks, Richard
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users