22 Dec
2011
22 Dec
'11
8:14 p.m.
| 2011/12/22 Edward Kmett <ekmett@gmail.com>: | > The change, however, was a deliberate _break_ with the standard that | > passed through the library review process a few months ago, and is now | > making its way out into the wild. | | Is it reasonable to enquire how many standard-compliant implementations | of Haskell there are? Just to be clear, the change IS the standard. GHC has to change to be compliant. At least that's how I understand it. Simon