Hi Simon, Thanks for the clarification, I attached the code to that ticket. Does this mean improvements in this area are supposed to land in 7.10? Semi-relatedly, before attempting the current code (which at least compiles), I had a few other attempts and I was hoping you (or other readers) might be able to shed some light on this baffling error (full code at the end): Could not deduce (Readable sock) arising from a use of ‘f’ from the context (Readable sock) bound by the type signature for readSocket :: (Readable sock) => Socket sock -> IO Message at test-old.hs:52:15-70 Relevant bindings include f :: forall (op :: SocketOperation). (Foo op sock) => SockOp sock op -> Operation op (bound at test-old.hs:53:22) readSocket :: Socket sock -> IO Message (bound at test-old.hs:53:1) In the expression: f (SRead :: SockOp sock Read) In an equation for ‘readSocket’: readSocket (Socket _ f) = f (SRead :: SockOp sock Read) It seems to me that “Readable sock” should be trivially deducible from itself? Cheers, Merijn {-# LANGUAGE ConstraintKinds #-} {-# LANGUAGE DataKinds #-} {-# LANGUAGE GADTs #-} {-# LANGUAGE RankNTypes #-} {-# LANGUAGE ScopedTypeVariables #-} {-# LANGUAGE TypeFamilies #-} module Test where import Data.Proxy import GHC.Exts data Message data SocketType = Dealer | Push | Pull data SocketOperation = Read | Write data SockOp :: SocketType -> SocketOperation -> * where SRead :: Foo 'Read sock => SockOp sock 'Read SWrite :: Foo Write sock => SockOp sock Write data Socket :: SocketType -> * where Socket :: proxy sock -> (forall op . Foo op sock => SockOp sock op -> Operation op) -> Socket sock type family Foo (op :: SocketOperation) :: SocketType -> Constraint where Foo 'Read = Readable Foo Write = Writable type family Operation (op :: SocketOperation) :: * where Operation 'Read = IO Message Operation Write = Message -> IO () type family Readable (t :: SocketType) :: Constraint where Readable Dealer = () Readable Pull = () type family Writable (t :: SocketType) :: Constraint where Writable Dealer = () Writable Push = () dealer :: Socket Dealer dealer = undefined push :: Socket Push push = undefined pull :: Socket Pull pull = undefined readSocket :: forall sock . Readable sock => Socket sock -> IO Message readSocket (Socket _ f) = f (SRead :: SockOp sock 'Read) On 02 Sep 2014, at 23:21 , Simon Peyton Jones <simonpj@microsoft.com> wrote:
I believe this is probably an instance of https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/3927
There are numerous other similar tickets, about GHC's inadequate/misleading warnings for non-exhaustive patterns. A selection is #595, #5728, #3927, #5724, #5762, #4139, #6124, #7669, #322, #8016, #8494, #8853, #8970, #9113.
Tom Schrijvers and colleagues are working on this right now, I'm glad to say.
Please do add your example to #3927, so that we can be sure to use it as a regression test when testing Tom's shiny new version.
Simon
| -----Original Message----- | From: Glasgow-haskell-users [mailto:glasgow-haskell-users- | bounces@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Merijn Verstraaten | Sent: 03 September 2014 06:59 | To: GHC Users List | Subject: GHC not able to detect impossible GADT pattern | | I've been trying to stretch GHC's type system again and somehow managed | to get myself into a position where GHC warns about a non-exhaustive | pattern where adding the (according to GHC) missing pattern results in a | type error (as intended by me). It seems that even with closed type | families GHC can't infer some patterns can never occur? Complete code to | reproduce the issue is including below, the non-exhaustive pattern | happens in the local definitions 'f' of push and pull. | | I'm open to suggestions for other approaches. | | Kind regards, | Merijn | | {-# LANGUAGE ConstraintKinds #-} | {-# LANGUAGE DataKinds #-} | {-# LANGUAGE GADTs #-} | {-# LANGUAGE RankNTypes #-} | {-# LANGUAGE ScopedTypeVariables #-} | {-# LANGUAGE TypeFamilies #-} | {-# LANGUAGE TypeOperators #-} | {-# LANGUAGE UndecidableInstances #-} | module Test where | | import Data.Proxy | import GHC.Exts | | data Message | | data SocketType = Dealer | Push | Pull | | data SocketOperation = Read | Write | | type family Restrict (a :: SocketOperation) (as :: [SocketOperation]) :: | Constraint where | Restrict a (a ': as) = () | Restrict x (a ': as) = Restrict x as | Restrict x '[] = ("Error!" ~ "Tried to apply a restricted type!") | | type family Implements (t :: SocketType) :: [SocketOperation] where | Implements Dealer = ['Read, Write] | Implements Push = '[Write] | Implements Pull = '[ 'Read] | | data SockOp :: SocketType -> SocketOperation -> * where | SRead :: SockOp sock 'Read | SWrite :: SockOp sock Write | | data Socket :: SocketType -> * where | Socket :: proxy sock | -> (forall op . Restrict op (Implements sock) => SockOp sock | op -> Operation op) | -> Socket sock | | type family Operation (op :: SocketOperation) :: * where | Operation 'Read = IO Message | Operation Write = Message -> IO () | | class Restrict 'Read (Implements t) => Readable t where | readSocket :: Socket t -> Operation 'Read | readSocket (Socket _ f) = f (SRead :: SockOp t 'Read) | | instance Readable Dealer | | type family Writable (t :: SocketType) :: Constraint where | Writable Dealer = () | Writable Push = () | | dealer :: Socket Dealer | dealer = Socket (Proxy :: Proxy Dealer) f | where | f :: Restrict op (Implements Dealer) => SockOp Dealer op -> Operation | op | f SRead = undefined | f SWrite = undefined | | push :: Socket Push | push = Socket (Proxy :: Proxy Push) f | where | f :: Restrict op (Implements Push) => SockOp Push op -> Operation op | f SWrite = undefined | | pull :: Socket Pull | pull = Socket (Proxy :: Proxy Pull) f | where | f :: Restrict op (Implements Pull) => SockOp Pull op -> Operation op | f SRead = undefined | | foo :: IO Message | foo = readSocket dealer