Re: Overloaded record fields

Simon, Yes, your summary is exactly what I meant. 2013/6/26 Simon Peyton-Jones <simonpj@microsoft.com>:

In fact, your observation allows us to regard our proposal as consisting of two entirely orthogonal parts * Generalise the type of record field selectors * Introduce period as reverse function application

As Anthony points out below, I think the orthogonality is also an important benefit. It could allow people like Edward and others who dislike DotAsPostFixApply to still use OverloadedRecordFields. I expect just the OverloadedRecordFields extension would fit reasonably well into the existing lens libraries somehow. Regards Dominique