OK, done. I've documented infix classes too.
Simon
| -----Original Message-----
| From: glasgow-haskell-users-bounces@haskell.org
[mailto:glasgow-haskell-users-
| bounces@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Johan Glimming
| Sent: 17 February 2005 10:04
| To:
; Simon Marlow
| Subject: Re: GHC-problem with parsing infix type synonyms - bug?
|
| > I think the syntax used in your type synonym declaration isn't
| > supported
| > at the moment. For consistency it probably should be.
|
| Is there any chance to fix this in the next 6.4 release, or can I
patch
| 6.4 myself? (I'd need hints though.) I have some code in a project for
| which I want to use type synonyms for instead of data type
definitions,
| to save on all the constructor names hanging around.
|
| Johan Glimming.
|
| _______________________________________________
| Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
| Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
| http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
