OK, done. I've documented infix classes too. Simon | -----Original Message----- | From: glasgow-haskell-users-bounces@haskell.org [mailto:glasgow-haskell-users- | bounces@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Johan Glimming | Sent: 17 February 2005 10:04 | To: <glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org> <glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org>; Simon Marlow | Subject: Re: GHC-problem with parsing infix type synonyms - bug? | | > I think the syntax used in your type synonym declaration isn't | > supported | > at the moment. For consistency it probably should be. | | Is there any chance to fix this in the next 6.4 release, or can I patch | 6.4 myself? (I'd need hints though.) I have some code in a project for | which I want to use type synonyms for instead of data type definitions, | to save on all the constructor names hanging around. | | Johan Glimming. | | _______________________________________________ | Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list | Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org | http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users