- Haskell-Cafe - Haskell.org

Google SoC: Space profiling reloaded
by Patai Gergely 01 May '09

01 May '09

Hello all, I'm one of the lucky individuals accepted for this year's Summer of Code. Here's the abstract of my proposal: http://socghop.appspot.com/student_project/show/google/gsoc2009/haskell/t12… There's less than a month left before I'm supposed to jump into coding, and I'd love to hear about any little idea you think would make this project even better! I created a project page with a rough draft of what I intend to concentrate on, but the issue tracker is obviously begging for content, so feel encouraged to populate it. :) http://code.google.com/p/hp2any/ I also intend to expand the description later. Gergely -- http://www.fastmail.fm - The professional email service

2 1

Arrow preprocessor and *** combinator
by Peter Verswyvelen 30 Apr '09

30 Apr '09

After doing some pragmatic tests, it seems that neither the arrow preprocessor nor GHC's builtin one generate / optimize to the (***) combinator. For example, p = proc (x,y) -> do x' <- f <- x y' <- g <- y return (x',y') is equivalent to p = f *** g But I have the impression this kind of rewrites is not being done? Is it possible to provide rewrite rules for arrows? Since *** is a method of the arrow type class, it might have a more optimal implementation. I haven't looked at the arrow preprocessor or GHC's code yet, but comments are welcome, I might see things wrongly. Cheers, Peter

3 4

unsafeSTToIO and stToIO
by Xiao-Yong Jin 30 Apr '09

30 Apr '09

Hi, Between the following two functions stToIO :: ST RealWorld a -> IO a stToIO (ST m) = IO m unsafeSTToIO :: ST s a -> IO a unsafeSTToIO (ST m) = IO (unsafeCoerce# m) All I can see is that the safe one uses RealWorld instead of an arbitrary thread s used in the unsafe one. I really don't understand the difference between these two. Why is the one without RealWorld unsafe? I tried google, but couldn't find anything helpful. -- c/* __o/* <\ * (__ */\ <

5 5

Help from C libraries experts
by Maurício 30 Apr '09

30 Apr '09

Hi, Do you understand very well a C library and would like Haskell to have a binding for it? I've been working on this package: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/bindings My goal is to have a place where one can find reliable and comprehensive low-level bindings to foreign libraries, so that writing higher level bindings becomes an easier task. If you are willing to help me with questions about your favorite C library, like compile options I should be carefull about or differences I may find between systems, I'll be glad to write a low level binding to it. Best, Maurício

6 10

Getting started - help
by applebiz89 30 Apr '09

30 Apr '09

What I need to do is build a type of database. Firstly have a few questions, whether what I have done it right...and how to do something else. This is my algebraic type for the database (correct me if its wrong) data Film = Film String String Int String with this as the data. testDatabase :: [Film] testDatabase = [("Casino Royale", "Martin Campbell",2006, "Garry, Dave, Zoe")] the last set of strings are the fans to the film. I want to be able to add a new fan, but not sure how to specifically insert it to there this is what I have so far: becomeFan :: String -> String -> [Film] -> [Film] becomeFan = do putStr "Which film are you a fan of: " filmTitle <- getLine do putStr "What is your name: " fanName <- getLine (if filmTitle == filmName then fanName : [Film]) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Getting-started---help-tp23314466p23314466.html Sent from the Haskell - Haskell-Cafe mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

4 6

Why do I need a 'do'?
by michael rice 30 Apr '09

30 Apr '09

Hi, Why do I need a 'do' in the code below? Michael ================== import System.Random rollDice :: IO Int rollDice = getStdRandom (randomR (1,6)) rollNDice :: Int -> [IO Int] rollNDice 0 = [] rollNDice n = rollDice : rollNDice (n-1) ================= [michael@localhost ~]$ ghci rnd0 GHCi, version 6.10.1: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ :? for help Loading package ghc-prim ... linking ... done. Loading package integer ... linking ... done. Loading package base ... linking ... done. [1 of 1] Compiling Main ( rnd0.hs, interpreted ) Ok, modules loaded: Main. *Main> rollDice Loading package old-locale-1.0.0.1 ... linking ... done. Loading package old-time-1.0.0.1 ... linking ... done. Loading package random-1.0.0.1 ... linking ... done. 6 *Main> rollDice 3 *Main> rollNDice 3 <interactive>:1:0: No instance for (Show (IO Int)) arising from a use of `print' at <interactive>:1:0-10 Possible fix: add an instance declaration for (Show (IO Int)) In a stmt of a 'do' expression: print it *Main>

4 4

default values in a record structure
by Vasili I. Galchin 30 Apr '09

30 Apr '09

Hello, Is there anyway when defining a dat type record struct to indicate default values for some of the fields? Regards, Vasili

4 3

A question about laziness and foreign resources (and libxml2)
by Graham Fawcett 30 Apr '09

30 Apr '09

Hi folks, I'm having trouble reasoning about laziness and FFI resources. I've written a little C wrapper function to augment Text.XML.LibXML; given a Ptr Node, it will return the node's tag-name: foreign import ccall unsafe _getName :: Ptr Node -> IO CString Given LibXML's 'withNode' function, I can write: withNode :: Node -> (Ptr Node -> IO a) -> IO a getName1 :: Node -> IO String getName1 n = withNode n $ \n' -> _getName n' >>= peekCString But I'm tempted to write this instead: getName2 n = withNode n return >>= _getName >>= peekCString In a strict language, I'd observe that the (Ptr Node) in getName2 was escaping the lexical scope of the withNode call, and so getName2 would be unsafe (since it might get GC'd upon leaving that scope). But in Haskell, I can't reason out whether that's the case. Is 'withNode n return' a risky proposition? Is lexical scope indeed the right test here? If not, how might you reason about the safety of this code? Thanks, Graham

1 0

INAP 2009: 1st CFP
by Pedro Salgueiro 29 Apr '09

29 Apr '09

[apologies for multiple posts; please distribute] ------------------------------------------------- First Call for Papers INAP 2009 18th International Conference on Applications of Declarative Programming and Knowledge Management November 5-7, 2009 Evora, Portugal http://www.di.uevora.pt/inap2009/ http://inap.dialogengines.com/ Organized by the Portuguese AI Society (APPIA), the INAP Committee and the Society of Logic Programming (GLP e.V.) == Overview == Declarative Programming is a family of advanced paradigms for the modeling and solving of complex problems. These specification and implementation methods have attracted more and more attention over the past years, e.g. in the domains of databases and natural language processing, for modeling and the processing of combinatorial problems, and for establishing systems for the web. == INAP 2009 == INAP is a communicative and dense forum for intensive discussion of applications of important technologies related to Prolog, Logic and Constraint Programming as well as closely related advanced software. It comprehensively covers the impact of programmable logic solvers in the Internet Society, its underlying technologies, and leading edge applications in industry, commerce, government, and societal services. INAP 2009 continues a tradition of successful workshops cast around the applications of declarative programming, which were held in Kobe (1997), Tokyo (1995, 1996, 1998 - 2001), Potsdam (2004), Fukuoka (2005) and Wuerzburg (2007). We invite the submission of high quality papers on the described topics, especially, but not exclusively, on different aspects of Declarative Programming, Constraint Processing and Knowledge Management as well as their use for Distributed Systems and the Web: - Knowledge Management, e.g. Data Mining, Decision Support, Deductive Databases - Distributed Systems and the Web, e.g. Agents and Concurrent Engineering, Semantic Web - Constraints, e.g. Constraint Systems, Extensions of Constraint (Logic) Programming - Theoretical Foundations, e.g. Deductive Databases, Nonmonotonic Reasoning - Systems and Tools for Academic and Industrial Use - Knowledge-based Web Services - Logic Solvers and Applications == Workshop Format == The technical program of the workshop will include invited presentations (to be announced), regular technical sessions with presentations of the accepted papers, system demonstrations and a panel discussion. == Conference Venue == The conference will be held at the University of Evora, Portugal in November 5-7, 2009. Evora is a nice and quiet historical city located in the south of Portugal that can be reached from Lisbon by train or coach in under 2 hours. It is a small city of 60.000 inhabitants, 120 km inland from Lisbon and classified by Unesco as World Heritage. The University of Evora was established in the 16th Century and is the 2nd oldest Portuguese University. The social program is promising since the region is very rich in historical sites (Stone Age, Roman, Medieval and Renaissance remains) and also offers a very special gastronomy. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89vora for more information. == Important Dates == Paper Submission Deadline: June 29, 2009 Notifications to Authors: August 17, 2009 Camera-ready Version Deadline: September 14, 2009 INAP 2009 Workshop: November 5-7, 2009 == Submission Guidelines == Participants should submit a paper (maximum 15 pages, PDF format), describing their work in topics relevant to the workshop. Accepted papers will be presented during the workshop. At least one author of an accepted contribution is expected to register for the workshop, and present the paper. All submissions should include the author's name(s), affiliation, complete mailing address, and email address. Authors are requested to prepare their submissions, following the LNCS/LNAI Springer format. Please see: http://www.springer.de/comp/lncs/authors.html for further details. The submission should be submitted through the electronic submission site: http://www.easychair.org/inap2009/ The deadline for receipt of submissions is June 29, 2009. Papers received after this date will not be reviewed. Eligible papers will be peer-reviewed by at least three members of the Program Committee. Authors will be notified via email of the results by August 17, 2009. Authors of accepted papers are expected to improve their paper based on reviewers' comments and to send a camera ready version of their manuscripts by September 14, 2009. Accepted papers will be included in the workshop proceedings, which will be distributed to the participants. As in previous editions, we plan to publish selected papers in a proceedings volume in the Springer Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (LNAI) series. == Organizing Committee == Vitor Nogueira vbn AT di.uevora.pt Salvador Abreu spa AT di.uevora.pt Pedro Salgueiro pds AT di.uevora.pt Universidade de Evora Portugal == Program Committee == Salvador Abreu, University of Evora, Portugal (co-chair) Sergio Alvarez, Boston College, USA Philippe Codognet, CNRS/JFLI, Tokyo, Japan Vitor Santos Costa, University of Porto, Portugal Daniel Diaz, University of Paris I, France Ulrich Geske, University of Potsdam, Germany Gopal Gupta, UT Dallas, USA Petra Hofstedt, Technical University of Berlin, Germany Ulrich Neumerkel, Technical University of Vienna, Austria Vitor Nogueira, University of Evora, Portugal Enrico Pontelli, New Mexico State University, USA Irene Rodrigues, University of Evora, Portugal Carolina Ruiz, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, USA Dietmar Seipel, University of Wuerzburg, Germany (co-chair) Terrance Swift, CENTRIA, Portugal Hans Tompits, Technical University of Vienna, Austria Masanobu Umeda, Kyushu Institute of Technology, Japan Armin Wolf, Fraunhofer FIRST, Berlin, Germany Osamu Yoshie, Waseda University, Japan == Contact Information == inap2009 AT di.uevora.pt Universidade de Evora Departamento de Informatica Largo dos Colegiais, 2 7004-516 Evora - PORTUGAL

1 0

Cabal's default install location
by Thomas Davie 29 Apr '09

29 Apr '09

There seems to be an assumption amongst the community that a user's home directory is the most useful place for cabal to install to by default. A few people have challenged that. I wanted to find out which one most people do actually prefer, so please go and vote on this poll. http://noordering.wordpress.com/2009/04/21/cabals-default-install-location/ It's no more than a straw poll, I don't know how protected it is against ballot stuffing, but I'm pretty confident that Haskellers are trustworthy enough not to play with it that way. I'll tell you all the result next week. Bob

11 18