- Haskell-Cafe - Haskell.org

ANN: shelltestrunner 1.10
by Simon Michael 12 Sep '23

12 Sep '23

I'm pleased to announce shelltestrunner 1.10 ! shelltestrunner (executable: `shelltest`) is a portable, GPLv3+ command-line tool for testing command-line programs or shell commands. It reads simple test specifications defining a command to run, some input, and the expected output, stderr, and exit status. It can run tests in parallel, selectively, with a timeout, in color, etc. The last release was 1.9, in 2018. The 1.10 release has been overdue; it brings some useful improvements, notably --print mode (with which you can convert old format 1 tests to the cleaner, recommended format 3), and precise line number reporting (to quickly locate the failing test). User-visible changes in 1.10 (2023-09-12): * GHC 9.6 compatibility (Andreas Abel) * Add --print for printing tests and/or converting file format (#24, Jakob Schöttl) * Add --shell option to select shell (#17, FC Stegerman) * Fix format1's handling of angle brackets in test data (#16) * Print test line number on failure (#14, Taavi Väljaots) * Add -p short flag for --precise * -h means --help, not --hide-successes * Clarify 300 char regex limit message Other changes: * Set up CI testing (#18 FC Stegerman, Simon Michael) * Improve bash-related tests (#20, FC Stegerman, Simon Michael) * Improved tests Thanks to release contributors: Jakob Schöttl, Taavi Väljaots, Felix C. Stegerman, and Andreas Abel. Install: $ stack install shelltestrunner-1.10 or: $ cabal update && cabal install shelltestrunner-1.10 Home: https://github.com/simonmichael/shelltestrunner

1 0

SPLASH 2023 Call for Participation
by Alcides Fonseca 12 Sep '23

12 Sep '23

====================================================================== Call For Participation ACM Conference on Systems, Programming, Languages, and Applications: Software for Humanity (SPLASH'23) October 22-27, 2023, Cascais, Portugal https://2023.splashcon.org/ Follow us on Twitter @splashcon ====================================================================== The ACM SIGPLAN conference on Systems, Programming, Languages and Applications: Software for Humanity (SPLASH) embraces all aspects of software construction and delivery to make it the premier conference at the intersection of programming, languages, and software engineering. ====================================================================== # Participation ====================================================================== The registration information, including the link to registration form is available at https://2023.splashcon.org/attending/Registration ====================================================================== # List of Keynotes/Invited Talks ====================================================================== SPLASH will feature three keynotes: Amal Ahmed, Northeastern University, USA Dimitrios Vytiniotis, DeepMind, UK Joe Hellerstein, UC Berkeley, USA SPLASH co-located events include a number of speakers: Andreas Rossberg, Independent, Germany (MPLR) Manuel Hermenegildo, IMDEA, Spain (LOPSTR) Maribel Fernández, King's College London, UK (PPDP+LOPSTR) Delia Kesner, Université Paris Cité, France (PPDP) Daniel Kaestner, AbsInt, Germany (SAS) Gagandeep Singh, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, USA (SAS) Bor-Yuh Evan Chang, University of Colorado Boulder & Amazon, USA (SAS) Loris D’Antoni, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA (SAS) ====================================================================== # List of Events ====================================================================== ** OOPSLA Research Papers ** Papers that address any aspect of software development are welcome, including requirements, modelling, prototyping, design, implementation, generation, analysis, verification, testing, evaluation, maintenance, reuse, replacement, and retirement of software systems. Papers may address these topics in a variety of ways, including new tools (such as languages, program analyses, and runtime systems), new techniques (such as methodologies, design processes, code organization approaches, and management techniques), and new evaluations (such as formalisms and proofs, corpora analyses, user studies, and surveys). ** Onward! Research Papers ** Onward! is a premier multidisciplinary conference focused on everything to do with programming and software: including processes, methods, languages, communities, and applications. Onward! is more radical, more visionary, and more open than other conferences to ideas that are well-argued but not yet proven. We welcome different ways of thinking about, approaching, and reporting on programming language and software engineering research. ** Onward! Essays ** Onward! Essays conference is looking for clear and compelling pieces of writing about topics important to the software community construed broadly. An essay can be an exploration of a topic, its impact, or the circumstances of its creation; it can present a personal view of what is, explore a terrain, or lead the reader in an act of discovery; it can be a philosophical digression or a deep analysis. It can describe a personal journey, perhaps that by which the author reached an understanding of such a topic. The subject area should be interpreted broadly and can include the relationship of software to human endeavours, or its philosophical, sociological, psychological, historical, or anthropological underpinnings. ** PLMW@SPLASH ** The SPLASH 2023 Programming Languages Mentoring Workshop encourages graduate students (PhD and MSc) and senior undergraduate students to pursue research in programming languages. This workshop will provide mentoring sessions on how to prepare for and thrive in graduate school and in a research career, focusing both on cutting-edge research topics and practical advice. The workshop brings together leading researchers and junior students in an inclusive environment in order to help welcome newcomers to our field of programming languages research. The workshop will show students the many paths that they might take to enter and contribute to our research community. ====================================================================== ** Workshops ** ====================================================================== **** CONFLANG **** CONFLANG is a workshop on the design, the theory, the practice and the future evolution of configuration languages. It aims to gather the emerging community in this area in order to engage in fruitful interactions, to share ideas, results, opinions, and experiences on languages for configuration. Correct configuration is an actual industrial problem, and would greatly benefit from existing and ongoing academic research. Dually, this is a space with new challenges to overcome and new directions to explore, which is a great opportunity to confront new ideas with large-scale production. **** FTSCS **** The aim of this workshop is to bring together researchers and engineers who are interested in the application of formal and semi-formal methods to improve the quality of safety-critical computer systems. FTSCS strives to promote research and development of formal methods and tools for industrial applications, and is particularly interested in industrial applications of formal methods. **** HATRA **** Programming language designers seek to provide strong tools to help developers reason about their programs. For example, the formal methods community seeks to enable developers to prove correctness properties of their code, and type system designers seek to exclude classes of undesirable behavior from programs. The security community creates tools to help developers achieve their security goals. In order to make these approaches as effective as possible for developers, recent work has integrated approaches from human-computer interaction research into programming language design. This workshop brings together programming languages, software engineering, security, and human-computer interaction researchers to investigate methods for making languages that provide stronger safety properties more effective for programmers and software engineers. **** IWACO **** Many techniques have been introduced to describe and reason about stateful programs, and to restrict, analyze, and prevent aliases. These include various forms of ownership types, capabilities, separation logic, linear logic, uniqueness, sharing control, escape analysis, argument independence, read-only references, linear references, effect systems, and access control mechanisms. These tools have found their way into type systems, compilers and interpreters, runtime systems and bug-finding tools. Their immediate practical relevance is self-evident from the popularity of Rust, a programming language built around reasoning about aliasing and ownership to enable static memory management and data race freedom, voted the "most beloved" language in the annual Stack Overflow Developer Survey seven times in a row. **** LIVE **** Programming is cognitively demanding, and too difficult. LIVE is a workshop exploring new user interfaces that improve the immediacy, usability, and learnability of programming. Whereas PL research traditionally focuses on programs, LIVE focuses more on the activity of programming. Our goal is to provide a supportive venue where early-stage work receives constructive criticism. Whether graduate students or tenured faculty, researchers need a forum to discuss new ideas and get helpful feedback from their peers. Towards that end, we will allot about ten minutes for discussion after every presentation. **** PAINT **** Programming environments that integrate tools, notations, and abstractions into a holistic user experience can provide programmers with better support for what they want to achieve. These programming environments can create an engaging place to do new forms of informational work - resulting in enjoyable, creative, and productive experiences with programming. In the workshop on Programming Abstractions and Interactive Notations, Tools, and Environments (PAINT), we want to discuss programming environments that support users in working with and creating notations and abstractions that matter to them. We are interested in the relationship between people centric notations and general-purpose programming languages and environments. How do we reflect the various experiences, needs, and priorities of the many people involved in programming — whether they call it that or not? **** PLF **** Applications supporting multi-device are ubiquitous. While most of the distributed applications that we see nowadays are cloud-based, avoiding the cloud can lead to privacy and performance benefits for users and operational and cost benefits for companies and developers. Following this idea, Local-First Software runs and stores its data locally while still allowing collaboration, thus retaining the benefits of existing collaborative applications without depending on the cloud. Many specific solutions already exist: operational transformation, client-side databases with eventually consistent replication based on CRDTs, and even synchronization as a service provided by commercial offerings, and a vast selection of UI design libraries. However, these solutions are not integrated with the programming languages that applications are developed in. Language based solutions related to distribution such as type systems describing protocols, reliable actor runtimes, data processing, machine learning, etc., are designed and optimized for the cloud not for a loosely connected set of cooperating devices. This workshop aims at bringing the issue to the attention of the PL community, and accelerating the development of suitable solutions for this area. **** REBELS **** Reactive programming and event-based programming are two closely related programming styles that are becoming ever more important with the advent of advanced HPC technology and the ever increasing requirement for our applications to run on the web or on collaborating mobile devices. A number of publications on middleware and language design — so-called reactive and event-based languages and systems (REBLS) — have already seen the light, but the field still raises several questions. For example, the interaction with mainstream language concepts is poorly understood, implementation technology is in its infancy and modularity mechanisms are almost totally lacking. Moreover, large applications are still to be developed and patterns and tools for developing reactive applications is an area that is vastly unexplored. This workshop will gather researchers in reactive and event-based languages and systems. The goal of the workshop is to exchange new technical research results and to define better the field by coming up with taxonomies and overviews of the existing work. **** ST30 **** Session types are a type-theoretic approach to specifying communication protocols so that they can be verified by type-checking. This year marks 30 years since the first paper on session types, by Kohei Honda at CONCUR 1993. Since then the topic has attracted increasing interest, and a substantial community and literature have developed. Google Scholar lists almost 400 articles with "session types" in the title, and most programming language conferences now include several papers on session types each year. In terms of the technical focus, there have been continuing theoretical developments (notably the generalisation from two-party to multi-party session types by Honda, Yoshida and Carbone in 2008, and the development of a Curry-Howard correspondence with linear logic by Caires and Pfenning in 2010) and a variety of implementations of session types as programming language extensions or libraries, covering (among others) Haskell, OCaml, Java, Scala, Rust, Python, C#, Go. ST30 is a workshop to celebrate the 30th anniversary of session types by bringing together the community for a day of talks and technical discussion. **** VMIL **** The concept of Virtual Machines is pervasive in the design and implementation of programming systems. Virtual Machines and the languages they implement are crucial in the specification, implementation and/or user-facing deployment of most programming technologies. The VMIL workshop is a forum for researchers and cutting-edge practitioners in language virtual machines, the intermediate languages they use, and related issues. The workshop is intended to be welcoming to a wide range of topics and perspectives, covering all areas relevant to the workshop’s theme. ====================================================================== ** SPLASH Posters ** ====================================================================== The SPLASH Posters track provides an excellent forum for authors to present their recent or ongoing projects in an interactive setting, and receive feedback from the community. SPLASH posters cover any aspect of programming, systems, languages and applications. The goal of the poster session is to encourage and facilitate small groups of individuals interested in a technical area to gather and interact. It is held early in the conference, to promote continued discussion among interested parties. ====================================================================== ** Doctoral Symposium ** ====================================================================== The SPLASH Doctoral Symposium provides students with useful guidance for completing their dissertation research and beginning their research careers. The symposium will provide an interactive forum fordoctoral students who have progressed far enough in their research to have a structured proposal, but will not be defending their dissertation in the next 12 months. ====================================================================== ** Student Research Competition ** ====================================================================== The ACM Student Research Competition (SRC), sponsored by Microsoft Research, offers a unique opportunity for undergraduate and graduate students to present their research to a panel of judges and conference attendees at SPLASH. The SRC provides visibility and exposes up-and-coming researchers to computer science research and the research community. This competition also gives students an opportunity to discuss their research with experts in their field, get feedback, and sharpen their communication and networking skills. ====================================================================== ** SPLASH-E ** ====================================================================== SPLASH-E is a forum for educators to make connections between programming languages research and the ways we educate computer science students. We invite work that could improve or inform computer science educators, especially work that connects with introductory computer science courses, programming languages, compilers, software engineering, and other SPLASH-related topics. Educational tools, experience reports, and new curricula are all welcome. ====================================================================== *** Co-Located Events *** ====================================================================== **** Dynamic Languages Symposium (DLS) **** The Dynamic Languages Symposium (DLS) is the premier forum for researchers and practitioners to share research and experience on all aspects of dynamic languages. After two decades of dynamic language research and DLS, it is time to reflect and look forward to what the next two decades will bring. This year's DLS will therefore be a special DLS focusing on the Future of Dynamic Languages. To do the notion of "symposium" justice, we will actively invite speakers to present their opinions on where Dynamic Languages might be, will be, or should be going in the next twenty years. **** Generative Programming: Concepts & Experiences (GPCE)**** ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Generative Programming: Concepts & Experiences (GPCE) is a venue for researchers and practitioners interested in techniques that use program generation, domain-specific languages, and component deployment to increase programmer productivity, improve software quality, and shorten the time-to-market of software products. In addition to exploring cutting-edge techniques of generative software, our goal is to foster further cross-fertilization between the software engineering and the programming languages research communities. **** Logic-based Program Synthesis and Transformation (LOPSTR)**** The aim of the LOPSTR series is to stimulate and promote international research and collaboration on logic-based program development. LOPSTR is open to contributions in logic-based program development in any language paradigm. LOPSTR has a reputation for being a lively, friendly forum for presenting and discussing work in progress. **** Managed Programming Languages & Runtimes (MPLR)**** The 20th International Conference on Managed Programming Languages & Runtimes (MPLR'23, formerly ManLang, originally PPPJ) is a premier forum for presenting and discussing novel results in all aspects of managed programming languages and runtime systems, which serve as building blocks for some of the most important computing systems around, ranging from small-scale (embedded and real-time systems) to large-scale (cloud-computing and big-data platforms) and anything in between (mobile, IoT, and wearable applications). **** Principles and Practice of Declarative Programming (PPDP) **** PPDP aims to provide a forum that brings together researchers from the declarative programming communities, including those working in the logic, constraint and functional programming paradigms, but also embracing a variety of other paradigms such as visual programming, executable specification languages, database languages, AI languages and knowledge representation languages used, for example, in the semantic web. The goal is to stimulate research in the use of logical formalisms and methods for specifying, performing, and analysing computations, including mechanisms for mobility, modularity, concurrency, object-orientation, security, and static analysis. Papers related to the use of declarative paradigms and tools in industry and education are especially solicited. **** Static Analysis Symposium (SAS) **** Static Analysis is widely recognized as a fundamental tool for program verification, bug detection, compiler optimization, program understanding, and software maintenance. The series of Static Analysis Symposia has served as the primary venue for the presentation of theoretical, practical, and application advances in the area. ====================================================================== # Organizing Committee SPLASH 2023: ====================================================================== General Chair: Vasco T. Vasconcelos (University of Lisbon) OOPSLA Review Committee Chair: Mira Mezini (TU Darmstadt) OOPSLA Publications Co-Chair: Ragnar Mogk (TU Darmstadt) OOPSLA Artifact Evaluation Co-Chair: Benjamin Greenman (Brown University) OOPSLA Artifact Evaluation Co-Chair: Guillaume Baudart (INRIA) DLS General Chair: Stefan Marr (University of Kent) GPCE General Chair: Bernhard Rumpe (RWTH Aachen University) GPCE PC Chair: Amir Shaikhha (University of Edinburgh) LOPSTR PC Chair: Robert Glück (University of Copenhagen, Denmark) LOPSTR PC Chair: Bishoksan Kafle (IMDEA) MPLR General Chair: Rodrigo Bruno (University of Lisbon) MPLR PC Chair: Elliot Moss (University of Massachusetts Amherst) PPDP PC Chair: Santiago Escobar (Universitat Politècnica de València ) SAS Co-Chair: Manuel Hermenegildo (Technical University of Madrid & IMDEA) SAS Co-Chair: José Morales (IMDEA) SAS Artifact Evaluation Chair: Marc Chevalier (Snyk) SLE Chair: João Saraiva (University of Minho) SLE PC Co-Chair: Thomas Degueule (CNRS, LaBRI) SLE PC Co-Chair: Elizabeth Scott (Royal Holloway University of London) Onward! Papers Chair: Tijs van der Storm (CWI & University of Groningen) Onward! Essays Chair: Robert Hirschfeld (University of Potsdam; Hasso Plattner Institute) SPLASH-E Co-Chair: Molly Feldman (Oberlin College) Posters Co-Chair: Xujie Si (University of Toronto) Workshops Co-Chair: Mehdi Bagherzadeh (Oakland University) Workshops Co-Chair: Amin Alipour (University of Houston) Hybridisation Co-Chair: Youyou Cong (Tokyo Institute of Technology) Hybridisation Co-Chair: Jonathan Immanuel Brachthäuser (University of Tübingen) Video Co-Chair: Guilherme Espada (University of Lisbon) Video Co-Chair: Apoorv Ingle (University of Iowa) Video Co-Chair: John Hui (Columbia University) Publicity Chair, Web Co-Chair: Andreea Costea (National University Of Singapore) Publicity Chair, Web Co-Chair: Alcides Fonseca (University of Lisbon) PLMW Co-Chair: Molly Feldman (Oberlin College) PLMW Co-Chair: Youyou Cong (Tokyo Institute of Technology) PLMW Co-Chair: João Ferreira (University of Lisbon) Sponsoring Co-Chair: Bor-Yuh Evan Chang (University of Colorado Boulder & Amazon) Sponsoring Co-Chair: Nicolas Wu (Imperial College London) Student Research Competition Co-Chair: Xujie Si (McGill University, Canada) Local Organizer Chair: Diana Costa (University of Lisbon) SIGPLAN Conference Manager: Neringa Young ======================================================================

1 0

OOPSLA 2024: Round 1 Call for Papers
by Umar Farooq 12 Sep '23

12 Sep '23

======================================================================== PACMPL Issue OOPSLA 2024 Call for Papers OOPSLA 2024 will be held as part of The ACM Conference on Systems, Programming, Languages, and Applications: Software for Humanity (SPLASH'24) October 20-25, 2024, Pasadena, California, United States https://2024.splashcon.org/track/splash-2024-oopsla ======================================================================== ### Important dates #### ROUND 1: Submission Deadline: Fri Oct 20, 2023 Author Response: Mon Dec 11 - Wed Dec 13, 2023 Author Notification: Fri Dec 22, 2023 Artifact Submission: Fri Jan 5, 2024 Artifact kick-tires: Sat Jan 6 - Fri Jan 19, 2024 Submission of Revisions: Sun Feb 11, 2024 Author Notification of Revisions: Sat Feb 24, 2024 Artifact Notification: Fri Mar 1, 2024 Camera Ready: Fri Mar 8, 2024 #### ROUND 2: Submission Deadline: Fri Apr 5, 2024 Author Response: Mon Jun 3 - Wed Jun 5, 2024 Author Notification: Fri Jun 21, 2024 Artifact Submission: Fri Jul 5, 2024 Artifact kick-tires: Sat Jul 6 - Fri Jul 19, 2024 Submission of Revisions: Sun Aug 4, 2024 Author Notification of Revisions: Sun Aug 18, 2024 Artifact Notification: Fri Aug 23, 2024 Camera Ready: Sun Sep 1, 2024 Papers accepted at either of the rounds will be published in the 2024 volume of PACMPL(OOPSLA) and invited to be presented at the SPLASH conference in October 2024. ### Scope The OOPSLA issue of the Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages (PACMPL) welcomes papers focusing on all practical and theoretical investigations of programming languages, systems and environments. Papers may target any stage of software development, including requirements, modelling, prototyping, design, implementation, generation, analysis, verification, testing, evaluation, maintenance, and reuse of software systems. Contributions may include the development of new tools, techniques, principles, and evaluations. #### Review Process PACMPL(OOPSLA) has two rounds of reviewing with submission deadlines around October and April each year. As you submit your paper you will receive around three reviews and an opportunity to provide an author response that will be read and addressed by the reviewers in the final decision outcome summary. There are 5 possible outcomes at the end of the round: *Accept*: Your paper will appear in the upcoming volume of PACMPL (OOPSLA). *Conditional Accept*: You will receive a list of required revisions that you will need to address. You must submit a revised paper, a clear explanation of how your revision addresses these comments, and "if possible" a diff of the PDF as supplementary material. Assuming you meet the listed requirements, after further review by the same reviewers, your paper will very likely be accepted. This process *has to be completed within two months of the initial decision* for the paper to be accepted, so we encourage timely turnaround in case revisions take more than one cycle to be accepted. *Minor Revision*: The reviewers have concerns that go beyond what can be enumerated in a list. Therefore, while you may receive a list of revisions suggested by the reviewers, this will not necessarily be comprehensive. You will have the opportunity to resubmit your revised paper and have it re-reviewed by the same reviewers, which may or may not result in your paper's acceptance. When you resubmit, you should clearly explain how the revisions address the comments of the reviewers, by including a document describing the changes and "if possible" a diff of the PDF as supplementary material. This process *has to be completed within two months of the initial decision* for the paper to be accepted in the current round, so we encourage timely turnaround in case revisions take more than one cycle to be accepted. *Major Revision*: You will receive a list of revisions suggested by the reviewers. Papers in this category are *invited to submit a revision to the next round of submissions* with a specific set of expectations to be met. When you resubmit, you should clearly explain how the revisions address the comments of the reviewers, by including a document describing the changes and "if possible" a diff of the PDF as supplementary material. The revised paper will be re-evaluated in the next round. Resubmitted papers will retain the same reviewers throughout the process to the extent possible. *Reject*: Rejected papers will not be included in the upcoming volume of PACMPL(OOPSLA). Papers in this category are not guaranteed a review if resubmitted less than one year from the date of the original submission. A paper will be judged to be a resubmission if it is substantially similar to the original submission. The Chairs will decide whether or not a paper is a resubmission of the same work. ### Submissions Submitted papers must be at most **23 pages** in 10 point font. There is no page limit on references. No appendices are allowed on the main paper, instead authors can upload supplementary material with no page or content restrictions, but reviewers may choose to ignore it. Submissions must adhere to the "ACM Small" template available from [the ACM](http://www.acm.org/publications/authors/submissions). Papers are expected to use author-year citations. Author-year citations may be used as either a noun phrase, such as "The lambda calculus was originally conceived by Church (1932)", or a parenthetic phase, such as "The lambda calculus (Church 1932) was intended as a foundation for mathematics". PACMPL uses double-blind reviewing. Authors' identities are only revealed if a paper is accepted. Papers must 1. omit author names and institutions, 2. use the third person when referencing your work, 3. anonymise supplementary material. Nothing should be done in the name of anonymity that weakens the submission; see the DBR FAQ. When in doubt, contact the Review Committee Chairs. Papers must describe unpublished work that is not currently submitted for publication elsewhere as described by [SIGPLAN's Republication Policy](http://www.sigplan.org/Resources/Policies/Republication). Submitters should also be aware of [ACM's Policy and Procedures on Plagiarism](http://www.acm.org/publications/policies/plagiarism_policy). Submissions are expected to comply with the [ACM Policies for Authorship](https://www.acm.org/publications/authors/information-for-author…. #### Artifacts Authors should indicate with their initial submission if an artifact exists, describe its nature and limitations, and indicate if it will be submitted for evaluation. Accepted papers that fail to provide an artifact will be requested to explain the reason they cannot support replication. It is understood that some papers have no artifacts. Please note that the artifact submission deadline will be following closely the paper submission deadline so make sure you check the Artifact Call as soon as you submit your paper to PACMPL(OOPSLA). ##### Data-Availability Statement To help readers find data and software, OOPSLA recommends adding a section just before the references titled Data-Availability Statement. If the paper has an artifact, cite it here. If there is no artifact, this section can explain how to obtain relevant code. The statement does not count toward the OOPSLA 2024 page limit. It may be included in the submitted paper; in fact we encourage this, even if the DOI is not ready yet. Example: \section{Conclusion} .... \section*{Data-Availability Statement} The software that supports~\cref{s:design,s:evaluation} is available on Software Heritage~\cite{artifact-swh} and Zenodo~\cite{artifact-doi}. \begin{acks} .... #### Expert PC Members During the submission, we will ask you to list up to 3 non-conflicted PC members who you think are experts on the topic of this submission, starting with the most expert. This list will not be used as an input during the paper assignment and it will not be visible to the PC. It may be used by the PC Chair and Associate Chairs for advice on external experts if the paper lacks expert reviews. ### Publication PACMPL is a Gold Open Access journal, all papers will be freely available to the public. Authors can voluntarily cover the article processing charge ($400 USD), but payment is not required. The official publication date is the date the journal is made available in the ACM Digital Library. The journal issue and associated papers may be published up to two weeks prior to the first day of the conference. The official publication date affects the deadline for any patent filings related to published work. By submitting your article to an ACM Publication, you are acknowledging that you and your co-authors are subject to all [ACM Publications Policies](https://www.acm.org/publications/policies), including ACM’s [new Publications Policy on Research Involving Human Participants and Subjects](https://www.acm.org/publications/policies/research-involving-huma…. Alleged violations of this policy or an ACM Publications Policy will be investigated by ACM and may result in a full retraction of your paper, in addition to other potential penalties, as per ACM Publications Policy. Please ensure that you and your co-authors obtain [an ORCID ID](https://orcid.org/register), so you can complete the publishing process for your accepted paper. ACM has been involved in ORCID from the start and we have recently made a [commitment to collect ORCID IDs from all of our published authors](https://authors.acm.org/author-resources/orcid-faqs). We are committed to improving author discoverability, ensuring proper attribution and contributing to ongoing community efforts around name normalization; your ORCID ID will help in these efforts. The ACM Publications Board has recently updated the ACM Authorship Policy in several ways: - Addressing the use of generative AI systems in the publications process - Clarifying criteria for authorship and the responsibilities of authors - Defining prohibited behaviour, such as gift, ghost, or purchased authorship - Providing a linked FAQ explaining the rationale for the policy and providing additional details You can find the updated policy here: [https://www.acm.org/publications/policies/new-acm-policy-on-authorship](htt… ##### Review Committee Review Committee Chairs: Alex Potanin, Australian National University, Australia Bor-Yuh Evan Chang, University of Colorado Boulder, USA Review Committee Associate Chairs: Anders Møller, Aahrus University, Denmark Lingming Zhang, UIUC, USA Review Committee: Aleksandar Nanevski, IMDEA Software Institute, Spain Alex Summers, University of British Columbia, Canada Alexandra Bugariu, ETH Zurich, Switzerland Ana Milanova, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, USA Andreas Zeller, CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security, Germany Anitha Gollamudi, UMass, USA Ankush Desai, AWS, USA Ashish Tiwari, Microsoft Research, USA Ben Hermann, TU Dortmund, Germany Ben Titzer, CMU, USA Benjamin Delaware, Purdue University, USA Bernardo Toninho, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal Bruno C. d. S. Oliveira, U. Hong Kong, Hong Kong Burcu Kulahcioglu Ozkan, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands Casper Bach Poulsen, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands Colin Gordon, Drexel University, USA Corina Pasarenau, NASA, USA Cyrus Omar, University of Michigan, USA Damien Zufferey, Sonar Source, Switzerland Dana Drachsler Cohen, Technion, Israel David Darais, Galois, USA David Pearce, ConsenSys, New Zealand Di Wang, Peking University, China Emma Söderberg, Lund University, Sweden Emma Tosch, Northeastern University, USA Fabian Muehlboeck, Australian National University, Australia Fei He, Tsinghua University, China Filip Niksic, Google, USA Fredrik Kjolstad, Stanford University, USA Guido Salvaneschi, University of St. Gallen, Switzerland Hila Peleg, Technion, Israel Jiasi Shen, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, China (Hong Kong) Jonathan Bell, Northeastern University, USA Jonathan Brachthäuser, University of Tübingen, Germany Joseph Tassarotti, New York University, USA Justin Hsu, Cornell University, USA Karine Even-Mendoza, King's College London, UK Kenji Maillard, Inria Rennes, France Matthew Flatt, U. Utah, USA Matthew Parkinson, Microsoft, UK Max Schaefer, GitHub, UK Michael Coblenz, UCSD, USA Milos Gligoric, UT Austin, USA Minseok Jeon, Korea University, Korea Mohamed Faouzi Atig, Uppsala University, Sweden Owolabi Legunsen, Cornell University, USA Pamela Zave, AT&T Laboratories, USA Pavel Panchekha, University of Utah, USA Rahul Gopinath, University of Sydney, Australia Rajiv Gupta, UC Riverside, USA Saman Amarasinghe, MIT, USA Santosh Pande, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA Sean Treichler, NVIDIA, USA Shachar Itzhaky, Technion, Israel Shaz Qadeer, Facebook, USA Sheng Chen, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, USA Shigeru Chiba, University of Tokyo, Japan Shriram Krishnamurthi, Brown University, USA Sreepathi Pai, University of Rochester, USA Stefan Brunthaler, University of the Federal Armed Forces in Munchen, Germany Steve Blackburn, Google, Australia Subhajit Roy, IIT Kanpur, India Sukyoung Ryu, KAIST, Korea Swarnendu Biswas, IIT Kanpur, India Thanh Vu Nguyen, George Mason University, USA Tiark Rompf, Purdue, USA Tien Nguyen, University of Texas at Dallas, USA Tomas Petricek, Charles University, Czech Republic Umut Acar, CMU, USA Wei Le, Iowa State, USA Wei Zhang , Meta, USA Xiaokang Qiu, Purdue University, USA Yingfei Xiong, Peking University, China Yizhou Zhang, University of Waterloo, Canada Youyou Cong, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan Yu David Liu, Binghamton, USA Yu Feng, UCSB, USA Yuepeng Wang, Simon Fraser University, Canada ##### Artifact Evaluation Committee Artifact Evaluation Committee Chairs: Guillaume Baudart, Inria - École normale supérieure, France Sankha Narayan Guria, University of Kansas, USA

1 0

heterogeneous container smart constructor question
by Zoran Bošnjak 05 Sep '23

05 Sep '23

Dear haskellers, I am trying to add some type safety to the program in the following situation: There are some distinct 'Item t' types which come in groups. That is: 'EList' container can contain either: - items 0,1 - items 0,1,2,3 - items 0,1,2,3,4,5,6 All other combinations (like items 0,1,2) are invalid and shall be rejected by compiler. The 'EList' implementation (see below) seems to have this property. In addition, I would like to define a smart constructor (mkEList), to simplify EList construction from some linear (no groups) IList type. In other words, mkEList shall slice IList to proper groups. I am aware that I need to use a type class / type families for this. I have tried several approaches, but ghc was not happy with any. What is the correct implementation of mkEList? Here is a sample code and the intended usage: -- (sample build-test.hs) import GHC.TypeLits data Item (t :: Nat) = Item -- List/group of items data IList (ts :: [Nat]) where INil :: IList '[] ICons :: Item t -> IList ts -> IList (t ': ts) nil :: IList '[] nil = INil infixr 5 &: (&:) :: Item t -> IList ts -> IList (t : ts) (&:) = ICons -- Extended list of groups data EList (ts :: [Nat]) (tss :: [[Nat]]) where EList :: IList ts1 -> Maybe (EList ts2 tss) -> EList ts1 (ts2 ': tss) instance Eq (EList ts tss) -- Manual test type T1 = '[0, 1] type T2 = '[ '[2, 3], '[4, 5, 6], '[] ] test1 :: EList T1 T2 test1 = EList (Item @0 &: Item @1 &: nil) Nothing test2 :: EList T1 T2 test2 = EList (Item @0 &: Item @1 &: nil) (Just (EList (Item @2 &: Item @3 &: nil) Nothing)) test3 :: EList T1 T2 test3 = EList (Item @0 &: Item @1 &: nil) (Just (EList (Item @2 &: Item @3 &: nil) (Just (EList (Item @4 &: Item @5 &: Item @6 &: nil) Nothing)))) -- Intended usage -- | Helper function or class method :: IList ? -> EList ? ? mkEList :: a mkEList = undefined el1 :: EList T1 T2 el1 = mkEList ( Item @0 &: Item @1 &: nil) el2 :: EList T1 T2 el2 = mkEList ( Item @0 &: Item @1 &: Item @2 &: Item @3 &: nil) el3 :: EList T1 T2 el3 = mkEList ( Item @0 &: Item @1 &: Item @2 &: Item @3 &: Item @4 &: Item @5 &: Item @6 &: nil) check :: Bool -- expecting True check = and [el1 == test1, el2 == test2, el3 == test3] -- (end of sample) regards, Zoran

3 4

The Haskell Foundation is seeking a new Executive Director
by David Christiansen 05 Sep '23

05 Sep '23

Dear Cafe, I just realized that we didn't yet post this here - apologies! I'll be stopping as ED of the Haskell Foundation at the end of the month, because I got an offer to go back to software development and work on a combination of technologies that I personally find extremely interesting (dependent types, procedural hygienic macros, language embedding, software verification, documentation and tools). It wasn't an easy decision to make, but I won't be disappearing from the world of pure functional programming. This means we need a new ED! You can see details here: https://haskell.foundation/careers/executive-director.html Every application received by the 29th will receive full consideration, but the board will continue taking applications until the new ED has been found. Until 22 September, I have time reserved to meet with people who are interested, but unsure about whether the role is a good fit. I myself have had these concerns - it was my first job not doing research or software development since I was 23 years old, after all. I'm happy to have an honest discussion about the job, how I did it, how someone else with different strengths might do it, what my daily life is like and the constraints that give rise to that, and so forth. Just let me know if you're interested. My canonical farewell post is here: https://discourse.haskell.org/t/an-opportunity-that-i-couldnt-pass-up/7485 Thanks for your support! I'll see you around. David

1 0

Call for Papers: JFP Special Issue on Program Calculation (papers due 1st Dec)
by Graham Hutton 04 Sep '23

04 Sep '23

================================================================== JFP Special Issue on Program Calculation https://tinyurl.com/prog-calc We invite submissions to the Journal of Functional Programming Special Issue on Program Calculation. Notification of intent : 20 October 2023 Submission deadline : 1 December 2023 *** If you are attending the ICFP conference in Seattle this week, please feel free to speak with Nicolas Wu if you have any questions about submitting for the special issue *** SCOPE The idea of program calculation, in which programs are derived from specifications using equational reasoning techniques, has been a topic of interest in functional programming since its earliest days. In particular, the approach allows us to systematically discover how programs can be defined, while at the same time obtaining proofs that they are correct. The aim of this special issue is to document advances that have been made in the field of program calculation in recent years. TOPICS Full-length, archival-quality submissions are solicited on all aspects of program calculation and related topics. Specific topics of interest include but are not limited to: - Program derivation and transformation; - Inductive and co-inductive methods; - Recursion and co-recursion schemes; - Categorical and graphical methods; - Tool support and proof assistants; - Efficiency and resource usage; - Functional algorithm design; - Calculation case studies. The special issue will also consider papers on program calculation that are not traditional research papers. This may include pearls, surveys, tutorials or educational papers, which will be judged by the usual JFP standards for such submissions. Papers will be reviewed as regular JFP submissions, and acceptance in the special issue will be based on both JFP's quality standards and relevance to the theme. NOTIFICATION OF INTENT Authors must notify the special issue editors of their intent to submit by 20 October 2023. The notification of intent should be submitted by filling out the following form, which asks for data to help identify suitable reviewers: tinyurl.com/intent-to-submit If you miss the notification of intent deadline, but still wish to submit, please contact the special-issue editors. SUBMISSIONS Papers must be submitted by 1 December 2023. Submissions should be typeset in LaTeX using the JFP style file, and submitted through the JFP Manuscript Central system. Choose "Program Calculation" as the paper type, so it gets assigned to the special issue. Further author instructions are available from: tinyurl.com/JFP-instructions We welcome extended versions of conference or workshop papers. Such submissions must clearly describe the relationship with the initial publication, and must differ sufficiently that the author can assign copyright to Cambridge University Press. Prospective authors are welcome to discuss submissions with the editors to ensure compliance. SPECIAL-ISSUE EDITORS Graham Hutton <graham.hutton(a)nottingham.ac.uk> Nicolas Wu <n.wu(a)imperial.ac.uk> IMPORTANT DATES We anticipate the following schedule: 20 October 2023 : Notification-of-intent deadline 1 December 2023 : Submission deadline 22 March 2024 : First round of reviews 12 July 2024 : Revision deadline 4 October 2024 : Second round of reviews, if applicable 29 November 2024 : Final versions due ================================================================== This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored where permitted by law.

1 0

ANN: hledger 1.31
by Simon Michael 03 Sep '23

03 Sep '23

I'm pleased to announce hledger 1.31 ! Highlights: - In conversion transactions, costs and equity postings are matched more tolerantly. - The `print` command now more closely replicates the original journal amount styles, which is helpful when round-tripping / cleaning up journal files. - Multi-pivot - the --pivot option can now construct account names from multiple fields. Thank you release contributors Dmitry Astapov, Eric Mertens, Jay Neubrand, and Jonathan Dowland. - https://github.com/simonmichael/hledger/releases/1.31 - https://hledger.org/release-notes.html#hledger-1-31 - https://hledger.org/install What is hledger ? - Fast, reliable, free, multicurrency, double-entry, plain text accounting software for unix, mac, windows, and the web - Built around human-readable, version-controllable plain text files - Inspired by and largely compatible with Ledger CLI, convertible to and from Beancount - Written in Haskell for reliability and longevity. For help getting started or more info, see https://hledger.org and join our Matrix/IRC chat or mail list: https://hledger.org/support . Newcomers, experts, contributors, sponsors, feedback are welcome! For more about plain text accounting, see https://plaintextaccounting.org . Live well and prosper, -Simon

1 0

OAuth on gitlab.haskell.org
by Julian Brunner 28 Aug '23

28 Aug '23

Hello, I last used gitlab.haskell.org in 2022 via OAuth on my GitHub account. However, this seems to no longer be an option. The account itself (https://gitlab.haskell.org/julianbrunner) seems to still exist, but I am unable to log in or request a password reset. I could not find any way to contact anyone on gitlab.haskell.org or any information on the removal of the OAuth option. Does anyone know how I can get my account back or who I should contact to get this sorted out? Cheers, Julian

3 4

debugging <<loop>> exception
by Dennis Raddle 28 Aug '23

28 Aug '23

I'm getting Exception: <<loop>>. It doesn't print the line number. When I load the program into ghci, it still doesn't print the line number. When I trace the program in ghci it never gets to the point of emitting the exception. I set up my program in stack. I tried both "stack ghci" and just "ghci".. the latter to make sure it wasn't using any compiled code (at least in my own code). If it doesn't print a line number does this mean it's happening in compiled code? Any ideas how I can go about debugging this?

3 3

Munich Haskell Meeting, 2023-08-30 @ 19:30
by Leah Neukirchen 26 Aug '23

26 Aug '23

Dear all, Next week, our monthly Munich Haskell Meeting will take place again on Wednesday, August 30 at Augustiner-Kurgarten (De-la-Paz-Straße 10, 80639 München) at 19h30. Different location as Rumpler is on summer holidays! For details see here: http://muenchen.haskell.bayern/dates.html If you plan to join, please add yourself to this nuudel so we can reserve enough seats! It is OK to add yourself to the nuudel anonymously or pseudonymously. https://nuudel.digitalcourage.de/xYna3xETL2UACtzT Everybody is welcome! cu, -- Leah Neukirchen <leah(a)vuxu.org> https://leahneukirchen.org/

1 0