23 Feb
2015
23 Feb
'15
2:06 a.m.
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Jeremy <voldermort@hotmail.com> wrote:
Compared to the Nim code [https://github.com/logicchains/LPATHBench/blob/master/nim.nim] for a longest path algorithm, Haskell [https://github.com/logicchains/LPATHBench/blob/master/hs.hs] looks horrendously verbose and ugly, even if you ignore the pragmas and imports.
Is this idiomatic Haskell style? Could it be clearer, but has to be written that way for performance - although it still takes 3.7x as long as the Nim version [https://github.com/logicchains/LPATHBench/blob/master/writeup.md ]?
A clearer version http://lpaste.net/120981 though this is 2x-3x slower than the Haskell version above.
Regards, Jyotirmoy Bhattacharya http://www.jyotirmoy.net